What, exactly, is the purpose of setting a new name, if we're not even doing distributions? Won't that really confuse people? Someone might as well take WalterOS (or whatever stupid name we put on it) and make a distro called "OpenBeOS". I'll bet you whoever does that will have the most popular distro. Unless we really have a good name. Ultimately, we should play on the trope that BeOS had, by using a super-common grammatical construct. That's why I suggested "IsOS" -- conjugating 'Be' into the present tense -- the subjunctive nature of the verb form 'Be' -- might have forshadowed its demise. ThisOS YourOS AnOS TheOS (though I think there already is one) MyOS OS Or, play off of them in other language, maybe? (weaker) KonOS (Japanese) CetOS (French) You're losing something real behind the personality of BeOS choices, with those unelected selections. They would make great codenames (a la BeOS Genki-4.5) but in my opinion, not the official name. It's really really hard to beat OpenBeOS (look at OpenOffice.org) Isaac