> I'm not disappointed in the slightest - my code made it into the > development trunk, so I'm happy. > > I do think it would paint Haiku in a better light if along with all > the > usual rhetoric of "fast, easy-to-use, functional" and expounding the > benefits of all the features it offers we have a relatively spiffy > interface to show off, as opposed to the "grubby" widgets we > currently have. > > I consider BeDecorator a branch where we can safely develop a working > replacement for DefaultDecorator without interrupting the course of > development on other things (nobody wants to have to use a broken > decorator when they're working on other parts of the UI :P). I've been kicking around the idea of doing a couple more decorators for official R1, but I've got well more than enough on my plate to keep me quite busy for some months. Personally speaking, I like the current decorator, but if you'd like to do some decorator hacking, please be my guest. :-) Just a word of warning: the MacOS and Win95 decorators in the tree have not been updated to work with the changes that have been made in the decorator code in the app_server, so they are broken. Then again, I'm not sure they are relevant anymore. --DarkWyrm