[openbeos] Re: OT list question
- From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: OBOS <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:26:38 +0100
Wow, fascinating (well, actually annoying ;-). Anyway, my original mail is at
the end.
On 2004-01-07 at 23:12:45 [+0100], FreeLists Mailing List Manager
<ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Your post appears to contain a valid Ecartis command as the
> subject, or one of the first few lines. The post has
> been forwarded to the list administrator in case it
> is a real post. If you were trying to issue a command
> send it to ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx instead.
>
> Matched pattern: ^.* subscribe .*$
>
> -- Original message --
> >From bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Wed Jan 7 17:12:44 2004
> Return-Path: <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> X-Original-To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Delivered-To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
> by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP
> id 20A61394A2C
> for <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 17:12:43 -0500 (EST)
> Received: from cs.tu-berlin.de (root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [130.149.19.1])
> by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA03892
> for <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Wed, 7 Jan 2004 23:09:41 +0100 (MET)
> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 23:10:39 +0100
> From: Ingo Weinhold <bonefish@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> In-Reply-To: <3FFC7FCD.8090203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Message-Id: <20040107231039.2892.5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> References: <5691664153-BeMail@guglielmo>
> <3FFC7FCD.8090203@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [openbeos] Re: OT list question
> To: openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> User-Agent: Beam 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
>
> On 2004-01-07 at 22:53:17 [+0100], Michael Phipps wrote:
> > Exactly the same for this list. The only way to try to get a user list
> > would be to subscribe with a bot that just captures email addresses on
> > the incoming. Wait - I take that back. One could spider through the
> > archives looking for any unbroken string with an "@" sign and consider
> > that an email address. Look at BGA's quoting below - a spider would end
> > up with Zenja's email. Hmm...
>
> No, those are rendered unreadable too:
> //www.freelists.org/archives/openbeos/01-2004/msg00023.html
>
> CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
