On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 12:46:26AM -0400, Michael Phipps wrote: > > I agree with you, that there has to be one way to do many of these things. > One set of standard paths. One naming convention. Etc. > This is one of the reasons that BeUnited.org became a standards group. > Because this isn't just about OBOS (although we are the coolest! :-)). > Because there is Blue and Cosmoe and Leonardo and so on. [snip] What? I hope I misunderstood your words but, it looks like the OpenBeOS guys are going to accept the rules dictated (cause a standard is a rule IMHO) from third-party company/organization... so, try to figure out this... BlueOS, MickeysMouseOS and SnoopyOS decide to move all startup scripts to a completely different system (think something like SystemV vs BSD), and BeUnited accepts these changes: now what should we do? Change our system cause others changed their mind? Personally, I don't really care about the others, i mean our aim is to develop the new BeOS, isn't it? And how can we innovate if someone has already the ability to change our destiny? And if BlueOS, whateverOS and PopeOS insert new kits in their system what should we do? Write our own kit following the example of the others, cause BeUnited told us it has to be?!?!? This is simply ridiculous, i mean, we are OpenBeOS (or at least who writes code is OpenBeOS..) and this idea of standards dictated from someone else simply sucks...i'm sorry... In the BSD world, the FreeBSD guys have their own idea and IF someone else is already working on something similar they will adopt that system, but they don't accept any order from anyone (organization, company, religion, or whatever...) they decide on their own... I'm sorry but the idea of the standards created from someone else is simply senseless... everything OBVIOUSLY in my HUMBLE opinion, and i hope NOBODY will be offended by my words/thought/etcetc.... =) -- Paolo Italian FreeBSD User Group: http://www.gufi.org