[openbeos] Re: BeBook license
- From: "Niels Reedijk" <n.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <openbeos@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 15:06:21 +0200
> That's right, but as we won't have as many changes to the R5 API it
> probably doesn't matter for now; and anyway that's an argument to put
> the documentation next to the code, not in the headers - you can't
> change the headers (because that would break binary compatibility),
but
> you can change the implementation at any point, like new return codes
> or whatever.
But the headers are the 'face' of the API. Secondly, placing Doxygen
configuration in the headers prevents a bit of extra work, because some
members (or the class itself) don't have to be explicitly mentioned to
doxygen. Anyway, as it is already decided, I will refrain from
commenting on this.
Niels
Other related posts:
