On Mon, 20 Aug 2001, Erik Jakowatz wrote: > > I'll guess that when we're done all the nice features we like in BeOS > > will be found in every other major OS anyway. > > You may be right, and if Linux/FreeBSD/etc. were to magically become as > cool a desktop OS as BeOS, I don't think so, not the first many years... but rewriting BeOS will also take many years and in that time Linux/... _will_ get several new features and HW-support (even though they will never get as sexy a foundation) which will give us an eternal struggle to keep up... while we rewrite BeOS. > ... The only other viable routes, in my mind, are Windows > and OSX. The invasive registration process that MS is implementing for > Windows XP and beyond rule that out for me -- that thing is *never* > going on my home system. If that means I don't get to play the latest > games, etc. then so be it. I'll be damned if I buy into the Big Brother > system they want to build. I 100% agree... that, and about 1000 other technical, ethical and pratical reasons why I have absolutely no interest in endorsing a Microsoft OS. > OSX seems, in at least a few ways, to be sort of cool, but I don't want > to be stuck buying unnecessarily expensive hardware that doesn't perform > as well I could easily live with a G4... if only I hadn't beg Jobs for permisson to use it for anything else than MacOS. MacOS X is actually really nice .. of course.. NeXTstep was nice :) ... but for now I prefer toying with GNUstep, which is nearing completion and they do a lot to be MacOS X compatible. > > Which is why reimplementing on a kit-by-kit, server-by-server basis > makes sense. It's definitely one of the better ways :) > For example, it would be pretty daft to reimplement the > net_server and *not* make sockets file descriptors,... Hmm. wouldn't that require a kernel modification? Gee... it's really shitty that BONE is still under NDA... at least the rest of BEOS 5 PE can be used. > I'm willing to cross that bridge when I get to it. If nothing else, > there's an awful lot to be learned in the process of trying to do it. =) That is correct... :) Peter