On 2008-05-01 at 13:48:20 [+0200], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 29.04.2008 um 11:35 schrieb Axel Dörfler: > > > Grzegorz Dąbrowski <grzegorz.dabrowski@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> Maybe we should add symlinks like this, what do you think? > > > I'm on François' side here: rather fix the buggy software. We're > > > already making so many compromises for those... > > In that case we should be consequent and eliminate the Be compability > > symlinks from the develop libs as well. They would still exist in the > > system libs folder for runtime compatibility. > > > > This would help cleaning up the -lnet / -lbind -lsocket confusion; > > looking at the symlinks, it seems new Haiku ports should be fixed to > > link against -lnetwork instead. > > Absolutely! Having those links (and using them) in develop/lib is just > wrong, and > could even cause the network functions to fail. I didn't notice they are > there, > yet. How about keeping the libsocket.so symlink at least? This one is not uncommon on other platforms (some/all (?) *BSDs and Solaris seem to have it) and configure scripts already check for it, which should save some porting work. CU, Ingo