[haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org

  • From: "Ingo Weinhold" <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
  • To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 21:31:15 +0200

On Tue, 17 May 2011 20:20:46 +0100 Adrien Destugues 
<pulkomandy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le 17/05/2011 20:15, Ingo Weinhold a écrit :
> > I was hoping we could address that when readying the package management
> support -- and I believe that was also what Oliver intended. Without proper
> package building tools building four versions per software package is very
> tedious and error prone.
> Should we drop the gcc4h target to make things simpler ? I feel it makes 
> things more complicated than needed and doesn't bring anything of much 
> interest, besides "testing purposes".
> At least it could be removed from BOM and we would not provide package 
> for it. Or are there too much people using it already ?

I mainly use gcc 4 or gcc 4 hybrid builds, but I guess mostly to have the 
better compiler compile all the source. The plan is to eventually switch the 
official releases to gcc 4 hybrid anyway, though.

CU, Ingo

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. haiku-development
  3. Archive
  4. 05-2011