[haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org
- From: Matt Madia <mattmadia@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:03:32 +0000
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 19:15, Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx> wrote:
> That is caused by 1. limitations of the build system, which installs only one
> version of a package (either gcc 2 or gcc 4), and 2. by there not being any
> packages available for that purpose. The deal is that we'll have to build 4
> versions of each package(*): gcc 2 for a primary gcc 2 Haiku (i.e. gcc 2 or
> gcc 2 hybrid), gcc 2 for a secondary gcc 2 Haiku (i.e. gcc 4 hybrid), gcc 4
> for a primary gcc 4 Haiku (i.e. gcc 4 or gcc 4 hybrid) and gcc 4 for a
> secondary gcc 4 Haiku (i.e. gcc 2 hybrid). On the regular Haiku release the
> gcc 2 and the gcc 4 for gcc 2 hybrid packages of a library have to be
> installed, so that it is available with either compiler.
>
> I was hoping we could address that when readying the package management
> support -- and I believe that was also what Oliver intended. Without proper
> package building tools building four versions per software package is very
> tedious and error prone.
Until the package manager is ready for trunk, would it be
possible/feasible/... to (temporarily) install files to gcc2/ or gcc4/
subdirs? This way, only two archives would be needed, things would be
easier for package maintainers, easier for the build system to manage,
...
--mmadia
Other related posts:
- » [haiku-development] Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Matt Madia
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- scottmc
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- pulkomandy
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Michael Lotz
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Michael Lotz
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Adrien Destugues
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Rene Gollent
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org - Matt Madia
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Urias McCullough
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Ingo Weinhold
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Matt Madia
- » [haiku-development] Re: Updates relating to build-o-matic, haiku-files.org- Adrien Destugues