"Jonas Sundström" <jonas@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's been some time since I looked at rc's code, but it looks fine > > from > > what I can tell. > > I would suggest to add defaults for the catalog entry, btw, so that > > only the catalog entry itself needs to be specified in the usual > > case. > Are you saying it should exclude the "x-vnd..." app signature part, > in the usual case, and optionally support providing one? I actually meant that one could define defaults for the string specifiers, ie. leave out the ":Window:ActivityMonitor" altogether, and when it's missing, use something like ":Application:<Name>" to look it up. Omitting the line by default completely, and let 'rc' then create the attribute from the app's signature automatically would work nicely as well, I'd guess. > BTW, does it need a unique resource definition ID? (type.def_id?) IIRC yes, but I'm not 100% sure. Bye, Axel.