someone on experts-exchange came up with a work-around. if you put the msi on sysvol rather than a standard share it installs perfectly. said he had the same problem. strange huh? On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Right. Office 2007 totally broke GP-based software deployment. I've > blogged about this a few times. MSPs are not really useful for GP-based > deployment. Your only real customization option comes in the form of a > config.xml file that allows for **some** customization. You're probably > better off deploy O2K7 via startup script with MSPs. > > > Darren > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Northwood, Ian > *Sent:* Friday, July 11, 2008 7:52 AM > > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > Am I right in recalling also that one can no longer use transforms for > Office 2007? I think you have to build patch files (MSPs, which are kind of > transforms) and deposit them in an 'Updates' folder? Check out > http://www.appdeploy.com and use the 'Package KB' link at the top of the > page or the 'Search' link off to the right. > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia > *Sent:* 11 July 2008 15:50 > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > Not using GP Software Installation. There is no "command line" > > > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *sunshine.baines@xxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Friday, July 11, 2008 7:45 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > You can pass the ALLUSER=1 throuh the install. > > Ex. Msiexec.exe (path to msi install) ALLUSER=1 > > Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from U.S. Cellular > ------------------------------ > > *From*: "Bobby Benninger" <bobby.benninger@xxxxxxxxx> > *Date*: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:29:01 -0400 > *To*: <gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > *Subject*: [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > Ok - wouldn't Microsoft have thought of this when they wrote the MSI or no? > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Nelson, Jamie <Jamie.Nelson@xxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Yeah, my bad. You can specify a transform, but not property arguments. I > haven't had to use GPSI in a long time since I'm lucky enough to have > SMS/SCCM for software distribution. > > > > Hold up and I can write the transform for you pretty quickly. > > > > *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon > Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Darren Mar-Elia > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:59 PM > > > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > You would need to either write a transform to make that property > modification or modify the MSI package directly with a tool like ORCA. There > is no way to pass property options through GPSI. > > > Darren > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Nelson, Jamie > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 12:55 PM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > No I would not do that. Just remove the software install and re-create it > under computer configuration. You should be able to pass the ALLUSERS=1 > property when you recreate the package. If memory serves me, you can't > modify the arguments after the package has already been created. > > > > *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon > Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Bobby Benninger > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 2:40 PM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > should i re-create it as per-user instead of per-computer? > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Darren Mar-Elia <darren@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > To add onto this Bobby, it doesn't actually sound like the package > installed successfully, or at least it is not being activated successfully. > Did you install it per-user? IF so, did you select to install at first logon > in the Software Installation UI? > > > Darren > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Nelson, Jamie > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 11:46 AM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] Re: trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > Sometimes when you deploy software through Software Installation policy it > installs in "per-user" mode for the SYSTEM account. I always make sure and > use the ALLUSERS=1 argument to ensure that scenario doesn't happen. > > > > *Jamie Nelson* | Infrastructure Consultant | BI&T Operations | Devon > Energy | Work: 405.552.8054 | http://www.dvn.com > > > > *From:* gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:gptalk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Bobby Benninger > *Sent:* Thursday, July 10, 2008 1:40 PM > *To:* gptalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [gptalk] trying to deploy Office Compatibility Pack > > > > I am starting to really hate this MSI. > > > > Anyway I was having trouble before getting the GPO to apply because of a > USERENV error in the Application Log, I removed Symantec A/V to resolve this > error and now the GPO applies correctly. > > > > Now my problem is that even though the GPO applied and "Office > Compatibility Pack" shows in add/remove programs, whenever I open a DOCX > file I get prompted to do download the Compatibility Pack from Microsoft b/c > its not installed. > > > > I have read that when you do an assigned software install it doesn't > actually install the app, just preps it to install the first time you use > it. Could this be where things are getting caught up, b/c I am not "using > it" first correctly? > > > > Let me know what info you need to help troubleshoot. Thanks so much for any > advice. > > > > - Bob > * > ------------------------------ > * > > *Confidentiality Warning:* This message and any attachments are intended > only for the use of the intended recipient(s), are confidential, and may be > privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified > that any review, retransmission, conversion to hard copy, copying, > circulation or other use of all or any portion of this message and any > attachments is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, > please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, and delete this > message and any attachments from your system. > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > Liverpool Victoria Friendly Society Ltd. Registered in England and Wales. > Registered Office: County Gates Bournemouth England, BH1 2NF, No.61 Coll. > Financial Services Authority Register number 110035. > > This email (and any attachments): > > - is for its intended recipients only and may contain confidential and /or > legally privileged information. If received in error, any use of this email > is prohibited. Please delete it (and any copies) and notify us on +44(0)1202 > 292333, ext. 4044. > > - is believed to be free of any virus or other defect but internet > communications cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error free and we do not > accept any liability for any loss or damage from their receipt or use. > > Opinions expressed in this email are not necessarily those of the Society. > LV= and Liverpool Victoria are trade marks of Liverpool Victoria Friendly > Society Limited and LV= and LV= Liverpool Victoria are trading styles of the > Liverpool Victoria group of companies. > LV= reserves the right to monitor and inspect emails sent to and by its > employees. > > To find out more about us please visit: www.lv.com > ______________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. > For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email > ______________________________________________________________________ >