On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 09:19:10AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote: > Convert it into a much simpler Requirements statement, and couple it with > the extra meat as 'spec considerations'. I don't want to lose the extra > meat. ... > I'm leaning towards the second choice. It means I'll be super busy this > week, but I like it more. It is very useful to be able to refer to > requirments by an exact number. Too many requirements in the existing doc > are too spread about, and not clear. I want it to read more like Ron's > email: Agreed, I think thats better, but the specy stuff in an appendix. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe