[gmpi] Re: Implementations?
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 10:57:55 +0000
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:51:50 +0200, Juhana Sadeharju wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The more I read the discussions here, the more I'm convinced
> that this is wrong. We should have public or private host
> implementations by now. Implementations which with people could
> experiment with the ideas and come up with practical requirements.
>
> Now the discussions are not at practical level. It is great to have
> ideas on all kind of new gizmos, but I thought GMPI is only aiming
> toward a common plugin standard with existing gizmos. Many new
> gizmos are not used in the existing audio software.
IMHO standardisation procedures should not include experiementation or
research. If we are having to create new things for GMPI something is
going very wrong.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
