[gmpi] Re: Entry Point Function
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:37:23 -0800
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:46PM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> Part1: Do we insist on full COM compatibility?, or are we just picking
> the elements of COM most useful to us?
>
> If we don't need COM compatibility, we can call it what we like.
>
> Part2: What would you prefer to call it?
It's not a BIG issue, but if we're going to choose, let's call it
something meaningful like GMPI_GetFactory or similar. GMPI_Descriptor()
(apropos to a non-factory model).
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
