[gmpi] Re: Entry Point Function

  • From: David Olofson <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:43:04 +0100

On Tuesday 15 February 2005 01.37, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 01:30:46PM +1300, Jeff McClintock wrote:
> > Part1: Do we insist on full COM compatibility?, or are we just 
picking 
> > the elements of COM most useful to us?
> > 
> > If we don't need COM compatibility, we can call it what we like.
> > 
> > Part2: What would you prefer to call it?
> 
> 
> It's not a BIG issue, but if we're going to choose, let's call it
> something meaningful like GMPI_GetFactory or similar. 
> GMPI_Descriptor() 
> (apropos to a non-factory model).

if(NON_FACTORY == model)
        ++GMPI_Descriptor.votes;
else
        ++GMPI_GetFactory.votes;


Or maybe GMPI_GetDescriptor(), for that model...?


//David Olofson - Programmer, Composer, Open Source Advocate

.- Audiality -----------------------------------------------.
|  Free/Open Source audio engine for games and multimedia.  |
| MIDI, modular synthesis, real time effects, scripting,... |
`-----------------------------------> http://audiality.org -'
   --- http://olofson.net --- http://www.reologica.se ---

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules:  Please stay on topic.  You are responsible for your own
words.  Please respect your fellow subscribers.  Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.

Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe

Other related posts: