On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 12:10:45 +0200, Koen Tanghe wrote: > But the problem is that if you want to let the host handle this, it will > need to be a requirement for *all* hosts. The reason why people are building > the morphing into plugins themselves is because some hosts don't allow that, > and then there you are: you have a cool plugin that just screams for > morphing, and your users start complaining that they can't do it in their > host. So what do you do: you build it into your plugin... If you have a plugin that greatly benefits from morphing then build it into the paramters, by exposing an A set, a B set and a morph control - just like you do in a vector synth (X,Y and A, B, C and D sets). This doesnt require the plugin to update the hosts parameter values and it allows you finer control over how the morph happens, better reflection of the state of the plugin in the UI and it works well with host automation. - Steve ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe