Dear Philip, There are far more than four on this forum, I can assure you, but most prefer to just listen, which is fine. As regards infinity, we need to be clear on the distinction between an actual infinity and a potential infinity. Potential infinity is a concept. Actual infinity is a number. Numbers do not exist in their own right. Hence, the question, "how many beans make five?" is meaningless, because five is just a number and not a physical entity. Mathematics often leads to nonsense, paradoxes and singularities, because it manipulates numbers, without there necessarily being any physical significance to these numbers whatsoever. Neville. Philip <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Dear Neville, I have to admit that your post caused me to think hard. I felt like Jacks example of the man born blind who has never seen a colour, and thus cannot understand what blue is. How can I put my thought of infinity into words that mean the same thing to all. Perhaps impossible. but let me try. It came to me that the word REALITY. may be the problem. So I have to deal with this first. Date: 1550 reality 1 : the quality or state of being real 2 a (1) : a real event, entity, or state of affairs reality> (2) : the totality of real things and events reality> b : something that is neither derivative nor dependent but exists necessarily - in reality : in actual fact Main Entry: 2real Function: noun Date: circa 1626 : a real thing; especially : a mathematically real quantity Plus dozens of other definitions all the way to real estate. Basically from what I see its from a latin for truth or fact. Out of these various and confusing conditions I speak of a reality as being a TRUTH of from 2a. above a state of affairs. In other words I mean that "non existence" as a state does exist. This is opposed to others who would use the more material concept alone, and consider reality as applying to physical things. "the spirit or ghost is unreal" On infinity, I take up your last point first. "there is also the Biblical one that such a thing would be without end and therefore the Creation would not be finished, even now." God was, is, and ever will be. That is a mathmatical statement of a reality. God is eternal. No beginning and no end. Thus whilst I can understand how our finite little time and space universe is finite, has been created, and can be destroyed, (inihilated would have to be the more correct term) nevertheless we cannot, we dare not limit God to just one creation. We may speculate....on possibilities outside our existence. Meanwhile, you also said, "Infinity is a mathematical concept that has no bearing whatsoever on reality." That threw me. I have great difficulty with most complex mathmatical concepts. Likewise theoretical physics. I just have to be able to picture it in reality, else it does not exist. I actually visualise myself inside the atom and further, to see electricity flowing. So here is how I picture infinite space. It is empty space that has no barrier. It cannot have a barrier if there is nothing there. Space ( the void) would be there even if nothing existed. It is an infinite space where something/someone could be placed or created. A room does not have to have something in it to make the empty room a reality. The void is an EMPTY room with no boundaries. This reality means to me, that if I lived forever, (presumably with Grace I will as a friend of God,) and moved in any direction, I would never come to the end of space, because there is no end. Why is that not a reality? God is Infinite. Means God is everywhere, means God is physically infinite in all directions. God is not limited in time or space. Presumably after our resurrection, the new earth and the new heaven will likewise allow us in our immortal bodies to move in any direction, forever should there be any sensible reason to cause us to want to. Isn't that a reality of infinite space. and finally, "There is no basis for an "infinite universe," except to make people think that they are cosmically insignificant and that everything is futile and pointless." Perhaps the Devil would plan to make the pagan think like this. But true science which includes God, would see being "cosmically insignificant" as a manifestation of the glory and emmensity of God, that He would deign to value even something as insignificant as a grain of dust, by sending His only begotten to suffer on the cross to save it for Himself. Sorry for still seeming off subject. But is it really? Philip. PS I never get heated. I have no nerves, nor high opinion of myself. I am but a miserable sinner ever seeking adventures in science and discovery. I am sorry if this seems to create heat in my surroundings. I got kicked off one Roman Catholic list. But if the cap fits, one must expect it to get hot. Are there really only four of us here as Rob said? LOL. --------------------------------- ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!