[geocentrism] more on entropy
- From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2004 06:41:19 +1000
I guess I should apologise for keeping this going, but in principle the fight
for understanding geocentrism is based on the same plane as that of Creation.
So much is hidden by science using terms like "there are other expressions of
this law" etc. This is not an accusation. It is simply applied science. The
second law of Thermodynamics does not need to go very deep when discussing the
theory of the carnot cycle, as applied to heat engines.
This morning I awoke with a turmoil of thoughts remembered about entropy.
Mention is made of a closed system. Is there any such thing in an infinite
universe?
I know they mean a "finite system" with no external interference. But such a
thing is impossible when considering the universe which is infinite. This is an
infinite "sink" for energy to flow into. This is an inexcapable external
influence. Such is the nature of radiation.
During our study of entropy for heat engines (refrigeration), we did take
entropy to its fullest conclusion just for interest. At least we thought it was
concluded.
The first entropy for our thoughts was the equalisation of temperature.
Everything ended at the same temperature. Then of course, there is still
temperature due to the molecular vibrations. So this must radiate away with 10
to the nth time, till all molecular activity has ceased. This is the second
entropy. (any body care to speculate where all that radiated "heat" is going to
end up? It certainly cannot be destroyed).Radiation isn't "heat" either till
something is "hotted" up by it.
Next we have all that electron activity around the atom. According to the law,
it should all cease fall into the nucleus and neutralise all the protons till
we end up with a whole heap of "neutrons?". and giving out another heap of
radiation. Why would the electrons do that? Of course we know that
interplanetary space is not frictionless, and so yes orbits will degenerate.
But we cannot be sure this principle applies to atomic space. A perfect atom
should last forever.
Anyway so now we have this enormous MASS of neutral matter, which gravity, (or
the aether ? He He) has caused to come together. I miss Alan on this list. He
gave me so much confidence to proceed.
Anyway, now just what is the nature of this neutron? Or the proton for that
matter. I don't think we have reached total entropy yet. Not till all mass is
inihilated, and all that is left is pure raw energy of radiation expansion. Big
Bang of a different kind. ?????
The energy which God gave to His creation He takes back.
Even if all this were so, I have to agree with Rob that this does not disprove
evolution as a natural order of creation. It is a conceivable hypotheses for
there to be new and complex reactions coming out of this inihilation and the
energy it creates.
That will be my next follow up discussion, whichI hope will be short, and get
creation versus evolution off the agenda, and put geocentrism back,
Philip.
Other related posts:
