So if this description of hell is wrong what does that make Jesus? Jack Jack people who want to abolish Hell usually have a vested interest in doing so. And in support of my earlier account, notice that in the story of Lazarus the man is capable of coherency and mental activity, which would not be possible in any normal human under such extreme suffering. What is puzzeling to me is that the rich man is capable of compassion for his brother that he be warned. However I believe Hell is of many mansions downwards as heaven is upwards. Often the interpretations also use Hell in different contexts for different places. This can lead to many confusing errors. Let me state that in Catholic theology Hell is dogma. But the nature of Hell itself is open to presumption.. In other words, a mystery. From this extensive article http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07207a.htm I take these short samples of a very interesting and intense article of the various opinions.. "Hell (infernus) in theological usage is a place of punishment after death. Theologians distinguish four meanings of the term hell: a.. hell in the strict sense, or the place of punishment for the damned, be they demons or men; b.. the limbo of infants (limbus parvulorum), where those who die in original sin alone, and without personal mortal sin, are confined and undergo some kind of punishment; c.. the limbo of the Fathers (limbus patrum), in which the souls of the just who died before Christ awaited their admission to heaven; for in the meantime heaven was closed against them in punishment for the sin of Adam; d.. purgatory, where the just, who die in venial sin or who still owe a debt of temporal punishment for sin, are cleansed by suffering before their admission to heaven." The present article treats only of hell in the strict sense of the term. "The Latin infernus (inferum, inferi), the Greek Hades, and the Hebrew sheol correspond to the word hell. Infernus is derived from the root in; hence it designates hell as a place within and below the earth. Haides, formed from the root fid, to see, and a privative, denotes an invisible, hidden, and dark place; thus it is similar to the term hell. The derivation of sheol is doubtful. It is generally supposed to come from the Hebrew root meaning, "to be sunk in, to be hollow"; accordingly it denotes a cave or a place under the earth. In the Old Testament (Septuagint hades; Vulgate infernus) sheol is used quite in general to designate the kingdom of the dead, of the good (Genesis 37:35) as well as of the bad (Numbers 16:30); it means hell in the strict sense of the term, as well as the limbo of the Fathers................" "The poena sensus, or pain of sense, consists in the torment of fire so frequently mentioned in the Holy Bible. According to the greater number of theologians the term fire denotes a material fire, and so a real fire. We hold to this teaching as absolutely true and correct. However, we must not forget two things: from Catharinus (d. 1553) to our times there have never been wanting theologians who interpret the Scriptural term fire metaphorically, as denoting an incorporeal fire; and secondly, thus far the Church has not censured their opinion. Some few of the Fathers also thought of a metaphorical explanation. Nevertheless, Scripture and tradition speak again and again of the fire of hell, and there is no sufficient reason for taking the term as a mere metaphor. It is urged: How can a material fire torment demons, or human souls before the resurrection of the body? But, if our soul is so joined to the body as to be keenly sensitive to the pain of fire, why should the omnipotent God be unable to bind even pure spirits to some material substance in such a manner that they suffer a torment more or less similar to the pain of fire which the soul can feel on earth? The reply indicates, as far as possible, how we may form an idea of the pain of fire which the demons suffer. "' As I said, many opinions... There is much leeway of choice. Philip.