[geocentrism] Re: Thanks for reading

  • From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Glover, Rob" <rob.glover@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 15:21:44 +1000

I read The Universe according to Hoyle and the big bang, when about 17, and
at that time not very much concerned with God or His religion, I lapped it
up, plus all the evolution stuff. Space research in radio/electronics became
my carreer.Stargate is my curent crazy fantasy


Today as I look at the theory of the big bang, all it seemed to be telling
us is the story of the snake disappearing up its own arsehole.

Its not worthy of any consideration.Creation is real. We've proved it with
impirical evidence.

Philip.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr. Neville Jones" <ntj005@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 7:14 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Thanks for reading


Mike,

I am not aware of any claim that the "Big Bang" singularity must have
originally been swirling, but I think what Gary is referring to is the
nebular hypothesis relating to the origin of the so-called, "solar system."

Neville.



---------------------------------
 ALL-NEW Yahoo! Messenger - all new features - even more fun!



Other related posts: