[geocentrism] Re: [Geocentric] Predestination

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2007 10:40:46 +1000

yesithinkitiseasyenoughwhenonegetstorecognisewordswithoutarticulation

Philip.  
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Martin G. Selbrede 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 8:53 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: [Geocentric] Predestination




  On Jan 31, 2007, at 3:47 PM, philip madsen wrote:


    Martin as a bible student you must have considerable angst at the 
continuous script with no punctuation or even spaces between words???  of the 
ancient handwritten parchments.


  -- chuckling to self --



  Phil, I think the men who work through the uncial and miniscule codices, 
vellums, and papyri have done us an inestimable service in splitting out the 
words. HOWEVER...  in the 1970s I had some involvement in the typesetting of 
copious amounts of sermon texts (in English) dated in the mid- to late-17th 
century. This text used the so-called "long S," which looks like a lower case 
"F" ( f ) -- except that the right-half of the crossbar on the f  is missing 
(that is a VERY subtle difference to the eye -- a true tittle, so to speak).  I 
had to arrange for the creation of the special font to reproduce the sermons 
correctly, and then had to proofread countless dozens of them. (P.S. -- they're 
vastly superior and far more Biblical than modern 21st century sermons). At 
first, it was a huge pain dealing with the visual confusion, but after several 
months, I got used to the peculiar orthography (which, by the way, "mars" the 
original of the U.S. Constitution -- the long S was still in use a hundred 
years later). So, one CAN get used to peculiarities until you're able to read 
it on auto-pilot.


  Maybe I was constitutionally inclined to be able to adapt -- in the old days 
of molten lead typesetting, earning money for college in the early 1970s, I 
learned to read type that was upside-down and backwards (upside-down is the 
right way to insert handset type into the "composing stick," as it is called). 
At high school, I'd bet other students that I could read any book they chose by 
looking only at the page's image in a mirror, with the book held upside-down. 
Naturally, they all took the bet -- and lost. But typesetters since Gutenberg 
had acquired that skill.


  Ergo, the skill to read Greek without spaces between the words is also 
acquirable.  I just don't plan on acquiring it -- I'm content with today's 
printed editions of the Greek, replete with accents and diacritical marks.  
(The same holds true for the Hebrew -- I use the Kittel Biblia Hebraica.) 
Speaking of Hebrew, here's some trivia: when Cecil B. DeMille had the Ten 
Commandments engraved onto the tablets for Charlton Heston to carry down to the 
big party in the Israeli camp, he opted not to use Hebrew letters but ancient 
Phoenician letters, which he (wrongly) thought antedated Hebrew as a written 
language.  Puritan John Owen, in the 17th volume of his complete works, put the 
kabosh on that faulty construction of philological history in his 
still-unrefuted analysis of the antiquity of Hebrew.  Owen demonstrated (with a 
scholarship far deeper and wider than that of the skeptics) that the chronology 
of Cadmus's contribution came well after the Sinai event, and was derivative of 
it. In fact, Owen's most impressive analysis points to the disturbing 
consequence that the first phonetic language in human history was the wording 
inscribed by God's own finger on the tablets -- that until that point, 
ideographic (pictogram or hieroglyphic) written language (not phonetic 
language) had exclusively prevailed.   Owen's work (in his Biblical Theology) 
was left untranslated in its original language for three centuries, until Dr. 
Stephen Westcott did an outstanding translation of it into English in 1994. It 
represents a most impressive tour-de-force in theology, and the excursus on the 
antiquity of Hebrew is a highlight of it. Of course, his seven volume 
commentary on the Book of Hebrews is his really monumental life's work (the 
first two volumes are preparation for finally discussing chapter one, verse 
one!), and the other 16 volumes of his complete works are choice examples of 
Biblical scholarship at its zenith.


  Sorry to digress -- I think stream-of-consciousness thinking on this forum 
must be contagious!


  Martin






------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition.
  Version: 7.5.432 / Virus Database: 268.17.19/663 - Release Date: 1/02/2007 
2:28 PM

Other related posts: