Bryce Harrington wrote: > Philosophically, incompatibility is fine. But for me it's simply the > practical matter - if I have a book under FDL and some software under > the GPL, I can't use parts of one in the other. If I have some images > that I use in my GPL'd software, I can't transparently also use it in my > FDL-covered manual. > Actually, you can use FDL-ed works in GPL'ed software, as long as they are loaded into the software like fonts are, rather than incorporated as a part of the software's source code. The reverse is not true, as you mentioned, so I conclude that, because of this and other things, the FDL is over-all better than the GPL for non-software works. Of course, I'm not a laywer. -- -J. Jensen The above information has been deemed highly sensitive, especially to bright light and harsh abrasives. Use with caution, at your own risk, and never in combination with a blow-dryer.