[freefalcon-developers] Re: FreeFalcon OpenSource - Legal aspects
- From: Ian lennon <northstellaris@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: freefalcon-developers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 10:55:07 +0100
Really, the only owner of the code base is ATARY, no? and Owners of
additional Code, Art and DataBase must be his developers if they dont sign
any agreement with FreeFalcon or others, so ATARY at least, can say when
they like, Hey delete the source from an open place and....
Or not? am I in an error?
Cheers.
2013/1/17 Peter Meyer <pmvstrm@xxxxxxxx>
> Hi @ALL
>
> I think we should talk about the Legal aspects of our Project, so we can
> dogde any
> greedy attemp from someone who will sue us.
>
> First of all:
> The Legal Situation is not clear. I think where should refactor our
> Codebase as soon
> as possible to get rid of the old Codebase.On the new Code no one other
> then the
> FreeFalcon OpenSource Community has the Rights and no one else. I think we
> should
> go this Way but iam absolutly open for a open talk about the problems.
>
> Replacing Propetary Thirdparty and blackboxed Libs:
> As discussed with Vinny earlier, we should remove all binding to Thirdparty
> stuff wich is not Open Source or FreeSoftware (the GNU Definition of
> FreeSoftware).
> The Main License we distributing the Binaries and the Sourcecode Packages
> are the
> BSD OpenSource License (like PostgreSQL and many other famours OpenSoruce
> Projects)
> so we have allways to be carefull with other Licences who may conflicting
> if we use
> foreing Code.
>
> Just my opinions,
> Greetings, Peter
>
>
Other related posts:
