Re: [foxboro] Integration or replacement of AB PLC5 BMS?
- From: "Jones, Charles R. (Chuck)" <Chuck.Jones@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 09:49:56 -0500
Nigel,
We run our carbon furnace via integrated Foxboro / Allen-Bradley. We do
it with an AB30 gateway -- 19.2Kbaud KF2 -- Allen Bradley ControLogix
5500. (Since our ControLogix has to emulate a PLC5 for the
communications to work, there is no real difference from what you have.)
Since the BMS is written well enough to be self-contained we really
need the integration mostly for the graphic user interface. But, there
are a few loops (mostly temperatures, I think) that we monitor in the
I/A for alarm conditions. We OR the I/A alarms and pass a single
Boolean value back to the PLC for a shutdown on any of these conditions.
Anything that needs a response time of less than two seconds is
monitored in the PLC, because the KF2 limits our AB30 gateway to a two
second scan time.
We do two things for peace of mind. We have a "heart beat" continually
passing between the two systems to ensure we have communication. We
also monitor the position of the PROG-RUN-REM_RUN key switch via the
gateway. =20
PROS:
The PLC BMS is certified.
The I/O and wiring were cheaper.
The BMS was stand-alone, in the end it was not much different than
operating a valve or motor from the I/A.
CONS:
The gateway communications are slow.
Any time you have more than one control system controlling one piece of
equipment, it is a negative.
We have not had a problem with it since we put it in four years ago.
Chuck Jones
Automation Technologist
Tate & Lyle -- Lafayette South Plant
765.477.5324 - Office | 765.586.5290 - Cell
-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Baptiste, Nigel
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 7:50 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Integration or replacement of AB PLC5 BMS?
Hello List,
At our plant we are considering a boiler control upgrade and the BCS =3D
would be upgraded to the Fox I/A. However, the BMS is an AB PLC5 system
=3D
and the decision to be made is whether to replace it and implement in =3D
I/A system or use an integrator.
Does anyone have experiences with this sort of integration?
What are the pros/cons.
Cost would be a factor in the decision making process - however, =3D
reliability is key.
Regards,
NB.
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
***************************************************************************=
**************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended =
solely for the=20
use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not =
the intended=20
recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intende=
d recipient, be=20
advised that you have received this email in error that any use, disseminat=
ion,=20
forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If =
you have received=20
this email in error please notify the sender immediately. Please note that =
we reserve=20
the right to monitor and read any emails sent and received by the Company i=
n=20
accordance with and to the extent permitted by applicable legal rules.
***************************************************************************=
**************************
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
Other related posts:
