Re: [foxboro] Integration or replacement of AB PLC5 BMS?

  • From: "Jaudon, Mike" <Mike.Jaudon@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:06:43 -0600

Nigel,

Depending on what hardware you are getting for the I/A you can do
several things.

1) get an integrator for the AB PLC5 (which we do for our boiler
BMS)(disadvantage - communicates across the nodebus)
        (suspect if there are DCS network issues)

2) get an FBM224 (communicates directly with the Control
Processor)(disadvantage - not redundant)

3) If you're at the latest hardware and software versions you can use a
FDSI (Field Device system Integrator)
        (it communicates directly with the CP and is redundant)

That's about the extent of my knowledge.  I'm sure your account or field
service rep can help.

Regards,

Michael L. Jaudon
TRONOX, Inc.
(Technology Group-Hamilton, MS)
(662)343-8710 Office
(662)304-0313 Cell
mike.jaudon@xxxxxxxxxx

If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail message, any use,
distribution or copying of the message is prohibited.  Please let me
know immediately by return e-mail if you have received this message by
mistake, then delete the e-mail message.  Thank you.



-----Original Message-----
From: foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:foxboro-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Baptiste, Nigel
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 6:50 AM
To: foxboro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [foxboro] Integration or replacement of AB PLC5 BMS?



Hello List,

At our plant we are considering a boiler control upgrade and the BCS =3D
would be upgraded to the Fox I/A. However, the BMS is an AB PLC5 system
=3D and the decision to be made is whether to replace it and implement =
in
=3D I/A system or use an integrator.

Does anyone have experiences with this sort of integration?

What are the pros/cons.

Cost would be a factor in the decision making process - however, =3D
reliability is key.

Regards,
NB.
=20
=20
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
=20
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Djoin
to unsubscribe:      =
mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=3Dleave
=20
 
 
_______________________________________________________________________
This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process
Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at
your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html
 
foxboro mailing list:             //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro
to subscribe:         mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join
to unsubscribe:      mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave
 

Other related posts: