List, I have a control problem I'm hoping one of you has solved already. This refinery of course used to run on board instruments, and we completed a cutover to I/A over several years that wrapped up last year. In one of the areas, we have several sets of steam turbine pumps that are alternated in service every few weeks. On the old board, there were pressure controllers that were cascaded to HIC's which actually controlled the steam flow to the turbines. To avoid lots of re-designing and Management-of-Change paperwork, we decided to cut these schemes over as faithfully as we could to the original design. The way we ended up configuring these HIC's is as follows: PIC (PIDA block) -> HIC #1 (PIDA Block) -> HV#1 (AOUT Block) -> FBM37 or 05 connected to turbine control valve #1 ==> HIC#2 (PIDA Block) -> HV#2 (AOUT Block) -> FBM37 or 05 connected to turbine control valve #2 The HIC#1.MEAS is configured to the HV#1.OUT The HIC#1.INITI is configured to the HV#1.INITO The HIC#1.BCALCI and .FBK are configured to the HV#1.BCALCO The HIC#1.RSP is configured to the PIC.OUT The HIC#1.LR is configured to always be in REMOTE The HIC#2.MEAS is configured to the HV#2.OUT The HIC#2.INITI is configured to the HV#2.INITO The HIC#2.BCALCI and .FBK are configured to the HV#2.BCALCO The HIC#2.RSP is configured to the PIC.OUT The HIC#2.LR is configured to always be in REMOTE The HV#1.MEAS is configured to the HIC#1.OUT The HV#2.MEAS is configured to the HIC#2.OUT We couldn't figure out how to make the make the M/A transition on the HIC's bumpless, so they aren't. The Console guys just place the HIC that isn't in service in Manual and line up the HIC output with the PIC remote setpoint before switching turbines, and then put the newly-in-service turbine HIC in AUTO after the outside guy switches pumps. This is essentially what they did on the old board. What we have been seeing in recent weeks is a weird thing. On one of the sets of HIC's, and only one, the HIC.MEAS and HIC.OUT do not match, by about 20% difference, and in fact, the HIC.MEAS and HIC.OUT are constantly switching back and forth between the higher and lower value every half-second. The valve actually moves up and down in the field, but not as fast as the HIC is trying to move it, so the pressure stays relatively stable. I'm guessing there is some sort of problem with the way we have configured this scheme, having to do with the way the HIC.OUT = HV.MEAS and HV.OUT = HIC.MEAS such that some sort of bizarre feedback loop has been created. The weird thing is, we have 3 other sets of HIC's configured the same exact way, and they don't exhibit this strange behavior. Has anybody configured a scheme similar to this? Is there a better way to handle this? We need to send a Pressure Controller output as a setpoint to 2 or even 3 different Control Valves, but the valve(s) that isn't in service needs to be able to be controlled manually and shut when it isn't in service, and then matched up with the Pressure Controller output before it's put back into service. We don't want to use straight AOUT faceplates, because the Console guys aren't used to these, and will get easily confused when they see a different number in the AOUT.MEAS field (which would be the PIC.OUT) than in the AOUT.OUT field (the actual valve output). Another question is, what the heck is the deal with this HIC? Why is the HIC.MEAS and HIC.OUT differing by 20% when they are configured to follow each other, and all the other ones like this work fine? Tim Lowell Control Systems Engineer Phillips Petroleum Company, Trainer Refinery Phone: 610-364-8362 Fax: 610-364-8211 tlowell@xxxxxxxx _______________________________________________________________________ This mailing list is neither sponsored nor endorsed by Invensys Process Systems (formerly The Foxboro Company). Use the info you obtain here at your own risks. Read http://www.thecassandraproject.org/disclaimer.html foxboro mailing list: //www.freelists.org/list/foxboro to subscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=join to unsubscribe: mailto:foxboro-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=leave