I don't think it is so much government greed as it is government incompetence.
At least that is the way I seen here in Indiana. Several years ago our state relinquished control/administration/maintenance of the Indiana Toll Road system to a private contract company (foreign at that). The state got a big payout and the governor couldn't stop patting himself on the back.
But this euphoria didn't last long. Soon that company raised tolls, reduced the number to attendants at the toll booths and neglected maintenance. The situation got so bad that the state had to step in and provide a lot of the maintenance. Truckers were so upset with the costs, and the state of the road and delays, they started using the non-limited-access state highways to avoid the Tollway.
This resulted in increased maintenance required on the highways
and caused a lot more accidents and deaths due to these big rigs
clogging our state highways. These highways were never design for
these high traffic loads. These state highways snake through a
lot of towns too, slowing commuters and generally angering the
populace.
Needless to say this was a colossal fail.
correct. and when everyone refuses to pay for a $40 movie, the price will adjust. Not as simple when dealing with government-greed ... and everything government does is as a monopoly, so consumers are denied choice. I would fix this by moving everything government does out and into the competitive sector.To post, send email to FHS-65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and please be sure to sign all your posts and replies.
DP
In a message dated 3/4/2022 11:22:07 AM Mountain Standard Time, sfgrob@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:Indeed it is. But it is unfortunate that so many corporations abuse this so often now. There just is so little integrity left in business theses days. The motto "Greed is good" is alive and well.
Steve
On 03/04/2022 13:02, dpolhill (dpolhill) wrote: Market pricing is generally a good thing. A good mechanism for flattening demand. I'm still in shock over the Colorado-idiots who waited in line for 12 hours for an in & out burger ... a very high price to pay for the privilege of saying, "i was there on the day they opened." still ... their choice, so OK. just not for me ... world's foremost cheapskate.
DP
In a message dated 3/3/2022 8:35:40 PM Mountain Standard Time, dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:Holy sh*t! Haven't been to a movie theater in years ... I had NO idea! Donna Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Steve <sfgrob@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: 3/3/22 5:57 PM (GMT-05:00) To: FHS-65 <FHS-65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [fhs-65] ≈$40 I just watched a bit on the evening news about the new Batman movieTo post, send email to FHS-65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and please be sure to sign all your posts and replies.
coming to the AMC theaters. The story was about how AMC is charging
more for Batman than other movies, playing at the same theaters at the
same time. If we were both going to this movie, and would both go
together if we went, it would cost us nearly $40.
Does anyone else find this a ridiculously high price for attending a
movie? The theaters are complaining that people are not coming back to
the theaters - well, DUH!
Steve
To post, send email to FHS-65@xxxxxxxxxxxxx and please be sure to sign all your posts and replies.