Dear Colleagues, Sure, all lexicographers love printed dictionaries (me too!)- there is the beautiful scent of library, the nice feeling of paper between one's fingers, the passion of scrolling though articles, and of course the knowledge of lexicographer's work behind all useful and interesting informtion provided. Possibly, it is too early to send them off into retirement already; not everybody has access to electonic devices in their study or work yet. Like Geoffrey, Carla, Adam and others - also I'll miss new printed dictionaries. But most people are not lexicographers or lovers of words, for them a dictionary is just a tool, and as such its value is in the functionality and effciency of its use. And in this regard, electronic dictionaries are superior to the printed ones, looking-up is faster, they are easier to use. It is also much easier to maintain and update them so they easily be kept up-to-date even 10 years after their first publication. Further, when doing writings in a foreign language, one can first search the information needed in the electronic dictionary and then put it into the relevant context in the own writing and finally, check it in on-line texts, or even in an on-line accessible text corpus, to see whether the construction produced occurs frequently in texts in the language in question. If not - then, probably, something went wrong... So yes, Simon, Gilles-Maurice, Stephen and all using electronic dictionaries in their everyday work and appreciating them for their functional qualities - also I'm on your side! I keep my good, old printed dictionaries for my pleasure and use the electronic ones in my work. Best regards, Anna Braasch Senior researcher University of Copenhagen Centre for Language Technology Njalsgade 140 DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark TEL +45 3532 9071 braasch@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:braasch@xxxxxxxxx> http://www.cst.ku.dk ________________________________ Fra: euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] På vegne af Stephen Bullon [stephen.bullon@xxxxxxxxx] Sendt: 6. november 2012 11:20 Til: euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Emne: [euralex] Re: AW: Re: [DSNA] RE: End of print dictionaries at Macmillan I think Simon makes a good point. If there'd never been paper dictionaries before, we certainly wouldn't invent them now, with all the conventions that the constraints of paper impose on them. Anyone remember the early grammar patterns in the Oxford Advanced Learners Dictionary, or LDOCE1? VP18A was just one of a whole gang of largely unmemorisable codes (which have admittedly evolved since the first editions, but which don't need to be codified at all in a digital version). The potential for digital dictionaries is only just now being tapped, and there's a lot more to come. Like Geoffrey, I like books, and I'll keep my paper dictionaries, but I don't look in them anywhere near as often as I used to. And like Simon, I'll enjoy the much greater functionality available from digital resources. Stephen Bullon PS - I ought to declare an interest, as Publisher for Macmillan Dictionaries On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Simon Krek <kreks@xxxxxxxx<mailto:kreks@xxxxxxxx>> wrote: I wonder if anybody thought about similar resources that were conceived in the internet era – can you imagine for instance a printed Wikipedia with all the nice links from one article to another, simply impossible to follow. This is also the experience that future generations will never have. And similar to Wikipedia, future dictionaries will be massively interlinked– words will not be isolated at all, I expect them to be a huge sensibly organized browsable family, not to mention user-friendly vizualisations. It's a different experience – in the sense that not many of us experience everyday ride with a horse to the nearest barber. Simon Krek From: euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On Behalf Of Worsch, Wolfgang Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 10:24 AM To: williams@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:williams@xxxxxxxxxxx>; euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [euralex] AW: Re: [DSNA] RE: End of print dictionaries at Macmillan I totally agree with Geoffrey – to me Macmillan’s decision is a sad one. If it is the start of an overall trend future generations of (dictionary) users will not have the enriching opportunity to “leaf through” a dictionary. Instead they will “key in and enter” isolated words. Reference skills will be reduced to using a keyboard or touch-screen. Wolfgang Worsch Von: euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von WILLIAMS Geoffrey Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. November 2012 09:52 An: euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Betreff: [euralex] Re: [DSNA] RE: End of print dictionaries at Macmillan It is indeed a sad day for us page turners who also like comparing editions. In powercuts, paper is so useful. The dictionary is also an object of value, not just a support for words. In teaching, paper editions are a wonderful tool against cheating in exams, and anyway we cannot guarantee that all students have access to electronic tools, and certainly not internet outside the uni. But I suppose I am old and should be put on a bonfire along with my precious books. Geoffrey Le 06/11/2012 08:52, KILGARRIFF Matthew (RIC-CH) a écrit : A new dark age beckons. From: adam.kilgarriff@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:adam.kilgarriff@xxxxxxxxx> [mailto:adam.kilgarriff@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Adam Kilgarriff Sent: 06 November 2012 08:17 To: Lexicophile@xxxxxxx<mailto:Lexicophile@xxxxxxx> Cc: euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; DSNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:DSNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lexicographylist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lexicographylist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; asialex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:asialex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; afrilex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:afrilex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; lexicografie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lexicografie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; ishll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:ishll@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Kilgarriff Raymond; KILGARRIFF Matthew (RIC-CH); KILGARRIFF PATRICK Subject: Re: [euralex] Re: [DSNA] RE: End of print dictionaries at Macmillan > What a sad day! Not at all! A day of liberation for the straitjacket of print! Adam On 5 November 2012 14:48, <Lexicophile@xxxxxxx<mailto:Lexicophile@xxxxxxx>> wrote: What a sad day! When looking up anything in a print dictionary, you generally stumble across all sorts of delightful material you never would have known to look for. With an electronic dictionary, generally speaking, what you search is what you get, and nothing beyond. Dan Pratt In a message dated 11/5/2012 6:00:16 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, gillesmaurice.deschryver@xxxxxxxx<mailto:gillesmaurice.deschryver@xxxxxxxx> writes: Dear Friends and Colleagues, This is Breaking News indeed! "Macmillan Dictionaries will no longer appear as physical books. The final copies are rolling off the presses at this very moment, and from next year, Macmillan Dictionary will be available only online." http://www.macmillaneducation.com/MediaArticle.aspx?id=1778 For the past decade or so, we have all been expecting an announcement like this from one of the major dictionary publishers, and I am happy to see that the honour goes to Macmillan, a key player in the monolingual learner's dictionary market for English. Finally getting rid of the paper constraints, and starting to exploit the true power of the digital medium -- and to be able to do just that -- is nothing less than a revolution. I predict that the other major publishers will now also stop talking about what should be done, to simply take the step and do it. More info in Michael Rundell's post below. Kind regards, Gilles-Maurice de Schryver President of AFRILEX and author of "Lexicographers' Dreams in the Electronic-Dictionary Age" (IJL 16.2, 2003, free access here <http://www.oxfordjournals.org/page/4646/3> ) From: euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex-bounce%40freelists.org> [mailto:euralex-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex-bounce%40freelists.org>] On Behalf Of Anne Dykstra Sent: maandag 5 november 2012 10:11 To: euralex@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:euralex%40freelists.org> Subject: [euralex] End of print dictionaries at Macmillan Macmillan has announced that, from 2013, it will no longer be publishing dictionaries in book form. It will focus instead on its expanding range of digital resources. Michael Rundell, Editor-in-Chief of the Macmillan dictionary list, sees this as both inevitable and entirely positive. He regards the printed book as a very limiting medium, and increasingly out of step with the way people look for information in the second decade of the 21st century. While printed reference books are out of date as soon they go on sale, an online dictionary can be kept fully up to date. More than this, the digital medium allows dictionary publishers to provide valuable additional resources, like audio pronunciations, interactive games, and a thesaurus function. As well as all these, Macmillan has a crowd-sourced dictionary (the 'Open Dictionary') fed by users from all over the world, and an active blog with four or five new posts every week on language-related issues. Michael says he was struck by one of the findings reported at the recent Euralex Congress in Gilles-Maurice de Schryver's plenary: his analysis of papers in the Euralex archive showed that the word 'look up' had declined in frequency and been overtaken by 'search'. This is the world that dictionaries belong to now. For more details, see the post on this subject in Macmillan's blog: http://www.macmillandictionaryblog.com/bye-print-dictionary. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] __._,_.___ Reply via web post<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSNA/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJvZG5ydGVxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEbXNnSWQDMTI3MwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNycGx5BHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-?act=reply&messageNum=1273> Reply to sender <mailto:gillesmaurice.deschryver@xxxxxxxx?subject=RE%3A%20End%20of%20print%20dictionaries%20at%20Macmillan> Reply to group <mailto:DSNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=RE%3A%20End%20of%20print%20dictionaries%20at%20Macmillan> Start a New Topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSNA/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJkYjR2ZnBjBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDbnRwYwRzdGltZQMxMzUyMTEzMjE0> Messages in this topic<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSNA/message/1272;_ylc=X3oDMTMzaGd0MDRvBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEbXNnSWQDMTI3MwRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawN2dHBjBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQEdHBjSWQDMTI3Mg--> (2) Recent Activity: Visit Your Group<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DSNA;_ylc=X3oDMTJkb25kcHM4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA3Z0bARzbGsDdmdocARzdGltZQMxMzUyMTEzMjE0> For more information about the DSNA: http://www.dictionarysociety.com<http://www.dictionarysociety.com/> Post message: DSNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:DSNA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Unsubscribe: DSNA-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:DSNA-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ******** REMEMBER: "REPLY" REPLIES TO THE ENTIRE LIST. ******** Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use • Send us Feedback <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> .<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> __,_._,___<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> -- ======================================== Adam Kilgarriff adam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Director Lexical Computing Ltd Visiting Research Fellow University of Leeds <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> Corpora for all with the Sketch Engine <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> DANTE: a lexical database for English <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> ========================================<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> <http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJjajcxbTU5BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzM5NjE5NARncnBzcElkAzE3MDUxMzcwODcEc2VjA2Z0cgRzbGsDZ2ZwBHN0aW1lAzEzNTIxMTMyMTQ-> ©2012 Richemont International SA. All Rights Reserved The information contained in this e-mail message is confidential - please do not cross-post. This communication is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, reliance, disclosure, distribution or copying of this communication may be prohibited by law and might constitute a breach of confidence. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and delete it and all copies (including attachments) from your system. -- Professor Geoffrey WILLIAMS. MSc, PhD Director of Department for Document Management, Directeur du Département d'Ingénierie du document LiCoRN - HCTI : www.licorn-ubs.com<http://www.licorn-ubs.com> / www.evalhum.eu<http://www.evalhum.eu> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ geoffrey.williams@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:geoffrey.williams@xxxxxxxxxxx> tél. +33 (0)2 97 87 29 20<tel:%2B33%20%280%292%2097%2087%2029%2020> - fax. +33 (0)2 97 87 29 31<tel:%2B33%20%280%292%2097%2087%2029%2031> Faculté de Lettres Langues Sciences Humaines et Sociales (LSHS) 4 rue Jean Zay BP92113, 56321 LORIENT CEDEX UNIVERSITÉ DE BRETAGNE-SUD www.univ-ubs.fr<http://www.univ-ubs.fr> / www.licorn.com<http://www.licorn.com> ________________________________ New Book: European Identity: What the media say. Paul Bayley and Geoffrey Williams (eds). Oxford: OUP http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780199602308.do <http://www.univ-ubs.fr/> ________________________________ No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com> Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5376 - Release Date: 11/05/12