On Mon, 25 Dec 2006 19:31:22 -0500 "Liviu Andronic" <landronimirc@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > That's a deliberate change. Not for any compelling reason, but to make > > commands consistent with actions (which must be cancelled when a session > > ends) and a probably-mistaken concern about managing zombie processes. It > > could readily be reversed. > > In my view, this is a dangerous feature. User doesn't expect such > behaviour from a file manager. Seems right. But presumably they do expect it from a terminal-emulator. And e2 is a bit of both, and happens to run commands somewhat like a terminal. Taking down child processes when > emelFM2 shuts down, can be very damaging. The exit warning does have a purpose beyond nagging ... I've tested it with > Mousepad: an unsaved document gets down (no promting for > saving/discarding). Other applications may be doing something > important for user, and the latter would not at all expect that > closing emel would close their program (ripping a dvd, for example, > with acidrip). > > emel's advantage is that _any_ command can be attributed to > buttons/keybindings: on a personal level, I use emel to start > applications that otherwise would be quite a mess to start in > Terminal. So, I start the application and then I close emel, as I > don't need him any more at that given moment Except in the case of computer resource limitation, that closure is essentially a user-choice (or habit), isn't it? I'm all for allowing old habits to persist, unless there's a good reason otherwise. And in this case, there is a reason, but I'm still not sure how good it is. (for example, emelFM2 in > combination with mplayer and an input box cacheing entries is one easy > way to get DVDs or VCDs playing). > > Well, I would be against this feature even as an option. Potentially, > it is too dangerous. Regards Tom -- Users can unsubscribe from the list by sending email to emelfm2-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field or by logging into the web interface.