[duxuser] Re: duxbury for blind users
- From: Daveed Mandell <daveed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: duxuser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 09:04:13 -0800 (PST)
I can only tell you that around here, people prefer Megadots--that is
blind people, but Megadots is a DOS program.
I'm updating my Duxbury, finally, to Windows, and everyone--about a dozen
people so far--is warning me about its pitfalls.
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004, Catherine Thomas wrote:
> Blind and sighted transcribers do things differently because they have to.
> In addition most blind transcribers are familiar with braille. This is
> very different from someone who doesn't know much about braille and is
> only trying to produce a readable document. Why can't there be a couple of
> different user manuals tailored to different sets of needs?
> Catherine
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -Catherine Thomas
> braille@xxxxxxxxx /
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * *
> * This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org.
> * To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
> * unsubscribe
> * as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also
> * subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription
> * options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive
> * is also located there.
> * Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
> * * *
>
* * *
* This message is via list duxuser at freelists.org.
* To unsubscribe, send a blank message with
* unsubscribe
* as the subject to <duxuser-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>. You may also
* subscribe, unsubscribe, and set vacation mode and other subscription
* options by visiting //www.freelists.org. The list archive
* is also located there.
* Duxbury Systems' web site is http://www.duxburysystems.com
* * *
Other related posts:
