i dont think its unreasonable to require a summary, if people edit, they are to put a summary unless its a minor edit, in which case the check the checkbox.. else the feed feature is broken.. imo we shouldnt flood dokuwiki with config options. On Sat, 2005-09-17 at 01:25 +0200, Esther Brunner wrote: > My opinion on this: > > - There should be an option $conf['requiresums'] defaulting to false. > If you make changes and do not enter a summary, the summary field > gets a red background already to hint the user at entering a summary. > I like this subtle behavior. > > - With $conf['requiresums'] set to true, in the case of an emty > summary field a javascript dialog box pops up asking you to enter the > summary or check the minor edit checkbox. > > - Minor edits should not be included in the feed. > > - On the recent changes page all edits should be visible, minor edits > with a special icon, a grayed out link or some other visual effect to > distinguish them easily. > > By the way: I just looked at how it is done in MediaWiki and I > noticed that the section title is entered automatically into the > summary field if you edit a section. That could be useful for us too, > don't you think? > > -- esther -- DokuWiki mailing list - more info at http://wiki.splitbrain.org/wiki:mailinglist