Good idea. Can't remember how to create filters with Outlook but know it's pretty straightforward. To use Gmail you'd tell the filter to apply a label to each message and then skip the inbox. Job done. Dave 2010/7/21 Liam McKenna <liammckenna@xxxxxxxxx> > Alex, > > If a lot of people complain about too many e-mails isnt it feasible to tell > them how to create an auto-filter? Every e-mail system i can think of has > one. They will just divert every e-mail on this list into one neat folder. > Gmail is the exceptions, iirc, in that it uses a "tab" system. > > Liam > > 2010/7/21 Alex Helling <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sorry about that. >> >> >> >> Just to clear it up, yes we are happy for anyone who wishes to be in both >> groups at the same time. I had simply assumed that most people would not >> want yet more emails (though I am hoping that the improvements group will >> not create so many emails as the RRT). >> >> >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> *From:* debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto: >> debatewiserrt-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *nadia siddiqi >> *Sent:* 21 July 2010 07:54 >> *To:* debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* [Debatewise RRT] Re: Debates >> >> >> >> *Hey,* >> >> *You never replied to my question on being in both groups?* >> >> *Taking: Republicans should endorse the strategic arms treaty with >> Russia.* >> >> The Republicans are intent on opposing Obama’s treaty on nuclear weapons >> with the Russians in the senate where the treaty needs to be ratified. They >> are however worried that it is a bad deal for America and that it will limit >> missile defence. But does the threat from Russia even matter anymore? We are >> no longer in the cold war and the big worries are about terrorism. It may >> indeed be a ‘bad’ deal for the US in that it accepts parity with a power >> that is now obviously militarily inferior. Without the treaty the US could >> produce many more nuclear weapons than Russia if it wanted to. So should the >> Russians endorse the treaty? >> >> http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/07/19/take_reagans_word_for_it<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F07%2F19%2Ftake_reagans_word_for_it> >> >> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502657.html<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2010%2F07%2F05%2FAR2010070502657.html> >> >> NADIA >> >> >> >> >> >> 2010/7/21 ace나그네 <firest12@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> *I want to improve 'Correct spelling and grammar are not important.'* >> >> >> >> --------- 원본 메일 --------- >> >> 보낸이: "Alex Helling" <alex@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> 날짜: 2010년 7월 21일 수요일, 02시 08분 43초 +0900 >> 제목: [Debatewise RRT] Debates >> 받는이: <debatewiserrt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Hi everyone, >> >> >> >> I don’t think I have anything to say this week >> except a reminder that if you are more interested in improving debates you >> may wish to switch groups. Email me if you do. >> >> >> >> Alex >> >> >> >> Debates: >> >> *Can big oil survive?* >> >> BP one of the big oil companies has been in serious difficulties with its >> leak from the Deep Horizon rig and BP is now also facing criticism for its >> dealings in Libya where it is now accused of lobbying the UK government to >> persuade the Scottish Justice Secretary to release Abdul Baset Ali >> al-Megrahi. Despite us entering a period of historically very high oil >> prices the big private companies are being squeezed. Their oil reserves are >> running out and they have to find new reserves in ever more difficult >> conditions, such as the very deep water where Deep Horizon was. In these new >> conditions smaller companies are likely to nimbler and more likely to find >> oil. The age of the big oil companies seems to be coming to an end. >> >> >> http://oilandglory.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/07/19/is_there_a_place_for_big_oil_in_the_post_bp_spill_world<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Foilandglory.foreignpolicy.com%2Fposts%2F2010%2F07%2F19%2Fis_there_a_place_for_big_oil_in_the_post_bp_spill_world> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2005/apr/21/oilandpetrol.news >> >> http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_20/b3984001.htm >> >> >> >> *Republicans should endorse the strategic arms treaty with Russia.* >> >> The Republicans are intent on opposing Obama’s treaty on nuclear weapons >> with the Russians in the senate where the treaty needs to be ratified. They >> are however worried that it is a bad deal for America and that it will limit >> missile defence. But does the threat from Russia even matter anymore? We are >> no longer in the cold war and the big worries are about terrorism. It may >> indeed be a ‘bad’ deal for the US in that it accepts parity with a power >> that is now obviously militarily inferior. Without the treaty the US could >> produce many more nuclear weapons than Russia if it wanted to. So should the >> Russians endorse the treaty? >> >> http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/07/19/take_reagans_word_for_it<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.foreignpolicy.com%2Farticles%2F2010%2F07%2F19%2Ftake_reagans_word_for_it> >> >> >> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/05/AR2010070502657.html<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Fwp-dyn%2Fcontent%2Farticle%2F2010%2F07%2F05%2FAR2010070502657.html> >> >> * * >> >> *Should the Ministry of Defence have to pay for Trident?* >> >> Everything is about money. The Conservatives may have said that Trident >> will not be on the review of defence spending and so not be open for debate >> on whether it should exist but this does not mean it is settled how it will >> be paid for. The MoD says that it is an issue of national security so it >> should not come out of its budget and the Treasury should pay. Not >> surprisingly for a department that is trying to reduce spending the Treasury >> is having none of it. >> >> >> http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/johnmcternan1/100047548/are-ministry-of-defence-sources-having-a-laugh-about-trident/ >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/jul/20/uk-defence-policy-unaffordable-liam-fox >> >> * * >> >> *The protests in Parliament Square should have been allowed to remain?* >> >> The protesters camping in Parliament Square have finally been cleared >> after Boris Johnson’s legal action to have them removed. Boris considered >> the protests ‘nauseating’ and many others will not have enjoyed the sight >> of the camp. But if we are a free society should we not be able to protest >> at the mother of parliaments? >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-10693138<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk-england-london-10693138> >> >> http://parliamentprotest.org.uk/ >> <http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fparliamentprotest.org.uk%2F> >> >> * * >> >> *Correct spelling and grammar are not important.* >> >> All languages undeniably change over the years, and these changes reflect >> how the words are used. The most important thing about written communication >> is that it is understood, not that it follows an arcane set of rules that >> benefit nobody. >> >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-1296126/Ideologues-illiteracy-MAX-HASTINGS-terrible-damage-wrought-schools-Left-wing-educationalists.html >> >> >> http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2010/07/19/is-sarah-palin-the-heir-to-shakespeare/ >> >> >> >> *FA discipline needs an overhaul.* >> >> A survey of the leading figures in English football has shown that many >> believe that the FA’s disciplinary body is inconsistent. It is obviously >> difficult to uphold rules if no one knows what the penalty will be for >> breaking them or whether it will be consistently applied. If this is the >> case then the best way is to overhaul the disciplinary system and look again >> at the rules and reissue them. When this happens they should be applied as >> consistently as possible. However might it just be leading figures in >> football seeing themselves as being discriminated against. If everyone is >> against the body perhaps it is doing something right! >> >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/leagues/premierleague/7584849/Bung-buster-Graham-Bean-wants-to-overhaul-FAs-dysfunctional-disciplinary-body.html >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/mar/19/alex-ferguson-fa-steven-gerrard >> >> >> >> *Is the Active Denial System ray gun the future of riot control?* >> >> The active denial system which has been around for a few years has yet to >> be used. It has potential application in suppressing riots without having to >> use deadly force or involving the armed services having to be brought in >> with rubber bullets or worse to control the riot. Instead the ADS could be >> used to engage at range with its heat ray forcing people to run for cover. >> >> http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ground/v-mads.htm >> >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7900117/The-Active-Denial-System-the-weapon-thats-a-hot-topic.html >> >> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/6300985.stm >> >> >> >> On the site: >> >> *Is Cameron’s Big Society all about the money?* >> >> Cameron may have had his idea about the big society to solve the problem >> of our broken society since before the beginning of the recession but now it >> is likely to be seen by everyone as a cost cutting measure. Cameron’s >> idea being about citizens doing things themselves and not relying on the >> state does seem like something that can be used to reduce spending. Now that >> Cameron has to reduce spending whether or not the big society is about >> reducing costs the policy will inevitably be tarred with cuts. Is it >> justified? >> >> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/camerons-big-society-attacked-as-a-cover-for-spending-cuts-2030334.html >> >> >> http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/steve-richards/steve-richards-but-what-if-the-big-society-doesnt-work-2030413.html >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10687446 >> >> >> >> *Was the invasion of Iraq worthwhile?* >> >> The former chief of MI5 today said that the terror threat was "undoubtedly >> increased" by the invasion of Iraq.* *We have known for some time that >> the initial cause for the invasion of Iraq, the possibility of Saddam having >> WMD, has been wrong. As the war was after the September 11th attacks another >> possible reason was terrorism. This too is now being acknowledged as being a >> false reason behind the invasion. However could the invasion still have been >> worthwhile? The Iraqis have gained freedom from tyranny and a sort of >> democracy, oil flows again and the economy and quality of life are slowly >> improving. >> >> h<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk-politics-10693001> >> ttp://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-10693001<http://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bbc.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fuk-politics-10693001> >> >> >> http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn2809-iraq-invasion-could-worsen-terrorist-threat.html >> >> http://www.e-ir.info/?p=4344 >> >> http://web.mit.edu/humancostiraq/ >> >> >> >> *Is new gel a breakthrough in the fight against AIDS?* >> >> Unfortunately no cure yet but researchers have invented a vaginal gel that >> cuts infection rate by up to 50%. It may not be a vaccine or a cure but it >> is a big step forward. Using condoms is the most effective of combating the >> spread of HIV and AIDS however this is reliant upon the men rather than >> women. This means that this gel is the first time women have had a chance to >> prevent infection without needing men to be involved. Is this a >> breakthrough? >> >> >> http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/austria/7899518/Medicated-gel-gives-hope-in-fight-against-Aids.html >> >> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-10691353 >> >> >> http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5i4btht5S9A6BF0UuIEGz5QoQuWCQ >> >> >> >> *Health and safety regulations have gone too far.* >> >> Local councils and businesses have become so risk averse in recent years >> that they refuse to let their employees or the public do the most basic of >> tasks. In Dudley, England, local people were warned off cutting the grass >> verge outside their homes because they did not have the correct insurance. >> >> >> http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1293508/Ill-end-health-n-safety-farce-PM-vows-cure-Labour-neurosis.html?ito=feeds-newsxml >> >> >> http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/jun/30/judith-hackitt-health-safety-work >> >> >> http://yourfreedom.hmg.gov.uk/restoring-civil-liberties/end-health-and-safety-madness-healthy-attitude-to-risk >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *Error! Filename not specified.* <firest12@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> *Error! Filename not specified.* >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Work done with anxiety about results is far inferior to work done without >> such anxiety, in the calm of self-surrender. Seek refuge in the knowledge of >> Brahman. They who work selfishly for results are miserable. --"Bhagavad >> Gita." >> >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >> Version: 9.0.839 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3017 - Release Date: 07/20/10 >> 07:36:00 >> > > -- www.debatewise.org 020 3393 7223 | 07956 292 567 Wave: dh.crane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx