In message <UNrvaQEuqcdLFw93@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> David Pilling <flist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In message <b40078e850.jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Nagel > <opro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes >>would it make sense to turn them all into "referenced" pictures? >>are there disadvantages? > The main problem is the obvious one, the referenced files may get lost > or separated from the document. which can happen : if you move or rename the folder containing the pictures : if you move the whole lot to a different filing system, e.g. from ADFS to IDEFS or HostFS etc. If the pictures are in the same directory as the document I *think* OPro uses relative paths, which will continue to work. Otherwise it can be a case of saving as DDL, then doing a search and replace in the DDL. For this reason I use referenced pictures while creating our monthly magazine, but once it's done I choose "embed all pictures", and save the archive copy with them embedded. -- Alan Adams, from Northamptonshire alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.nckc.org.uk/ To unsubscribe or subscribe goto: //www.freelists.org/list/davidpilling