Yeah Salie mentioned this at the session as well, with SF4 someone would
usually host a chat room on PSN and people would talk smack while waiting
on the next match. The 1 vs 1 experience seems a bit lonely :P
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:34 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Whats also annoying is with player base on PS4 and PC there aint really a
single platform to message people on.
Its very easy to miss invite notifications and messages when Im looking
away from the PS4 while trying to set up a game with somebody on steam or
the other way around.
Not really major complaint since the ability to actually play against PC
players is big bonus :P
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:29:17 +0200
Subject: Re:
From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ah okay, that's kinda lame :P
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yeap. Somebody hosts a lobby then invites the other player.
There are only 2 player lobbies atm tho
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:24:34 +0200
Subject: Re:
From: sameegh@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
How do you guys usually do this? Someone hosts a lobby like in SF4?
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:17 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ye, we can give it a shot
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 16:15:04 +0200
Subject: Re:
From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
We should try to connect later Paas.
GB lags because he's on 3G.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I managed to connect to Richard, GB and Chojin yesterday.
My GB games had unplayable lag tho
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 15:37:39 +0200
Subject: RE: Re:
From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Confirmed l can connect to Chojin in SFV. So that's 2 local peeps now :)
On 24 Feb 2016 15:14, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Outliers, are they?
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
*Sent:* 24 February 2016 03:03 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re:
I do know some girls with statistically fat tails though.
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thats what you get when you come in here with you London Tokyo nasdaq exec
kuk.
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, from the massive lack of responses I gathered that.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Stephen Scheidel
*Sent:* 24 February 2016 01:50 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re:
No.
On Wednesday, 24 February 2016, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is anyone here good with stats? Specifically fat tails.
*From:* Donaldson, Alasdair
*Sent:* 24 February 2016 11:24 AM
*To:* 'cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx' <cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* RE: Re:
I actually think the quincy does look cool.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Di Lhong
*Sent:* 24 February 2016 11:13 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZqUVChMpTJk
How many of his move list do you recognize is KOF or 2D game based? lolz
ps. short combo at towards the end of the vid. His counter hit b+1 b+1S!
into burning knuckle does a ton of damage for 3 combo hit -_-
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Genocide cuttah!!
On 24 Feb 2016 08:14, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The one Claudio player here (since he's the only claudio player) would
shout out KOF moves everytime he perform it. Especially Burning Knuckle...
Too funny.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:12 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Claudio is full of flash. KOF moves. Flame 'Fap' hand. Sparks flying
during moves. Coat physics blocking view shit. And if you manage to kill
someone with Rage Art...full troll ender (no other rage art looks as good
as his...the off-screen damage is what we call it here...In game 30% dmg,
physical world dmg 1000%)
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I always said Tekken needed more "flash"
On 24 Feb 2016 05:23, "Di Lhong" <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
T7 adding rage arts aka ultra and other flashy stuff makes it fun to play
and watch. Slow Mo is also hilarious (especially when neither players are
KO'd...which is a bit disorientating. But funny as hell to watch).
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 10:20 AM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ah ok.
I think SFV resembling Tekken a bit is more an accident when they changed
the game's system and no push back policy.
Tekken players here in BKK are transitioning into SFV mainly because it's
easier to pick up than SF4. Combos aren't as difficult. Simplifying the
normals so it's pretty much the same close and far also helps. :P Also, the
announcement of Tekken 7 FR put us all on pause for Tekken because it's
going to change a lot compare to vanilla T7...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 3:42 AM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
lol, nah man - a couple of us made the transition to SF4 (most guys here
were probably playing SF before Tekken). For me, I pretty much got into
fighters with Tekken 5 and then eventually got into SF afterward. I don't
think it had to do with wanting a game system that specifically resembled
Tekken. It was more a case of wanting to experience something different I
guess. It's great that more people are giving the series a bash though.
Similarly it'll be nice to see more peeps give Tekken a chance once it hits.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 9:45 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's a similar philosophy to tekken then i guess. Fast Pokes don't usually
have long range. Knd moves or "special" moves are more negative on
block/punishable.
The removal of push back also puts the two game closer in terms of
playstyle.
From the vids, it's no longer a cr.lk cr.lk fest... light attacks are
merely there to be "fast" (also other uses like anti air etc.) The removal
of far and close also make you utilize your movement more like tekken.
Let's put it this way, every tekken player here picked up SFV because they
can finally play the game with the similar philosophy. SF4 was untouched...
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
SF traditionally has safe pokes and specials, with the exception of 3rd
Strike.
SFIV had less-safe heavy pokes, but they could be used safely because of
the pushback and when the opponent didn't have meter for super (just like
3rd Strike). The safety of specials often depended on the strength you
used. Safety of specials was generally inversely proportional to the
strength of the move, with a few exceptions (eg. Sakura being + on EX
Tatsu).
In SFV heavies and specials are the most unsafe they've been in any SF
game either because of frame data, pushback or both. Pokes also have the
least range than before.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:39 PM, Di Lhong <marongdin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To me SFV seems to be closer to Tekken than a 2d game. The frame system
function very similar. (pokes = safe but not always +on block/ knd and
launchers are usually punishable)
Was it always like this in SF4?
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:58 PM, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I have no idea how you get that much stun,, but I get 640 with crush
counters ,, its all I can get
On Feb 23, 2016 4:31 PM, "Ryan Williams" <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've managed 690 stun with Nash outside of CC. Could be higher with CC.
On 23 Feb 2016 16:13, "richard moorcroft" <greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
That's a hell of alot,, I can get 625 with Nash atleast
On Feb 23, 2016 4:12 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Most I’ve seen with Ken was in the 750 stun range. Not mine, off a vid.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *richard moorcroft
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 04:10 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Re:
Whats the highest stun combo you guys have uncovered?
On Feb 23, 2016 3:37 PM, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 03:21 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Re:
Ya, you gotta commit - LB
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Oh, and I forgot one of the most annoying headaches. Every time you
change a mode, the game sends a status update to the server. Even if you
just change like a training mode option. That's why you don't get battle
requests when you pause. This is BEYOND stupid.
So if you're in training mode and you decide you've hand enough of
punching a static dummy, when you change the setting you miss any potential
match requests because Capcom thinks you're not available for matches.
That's right, the more effective you are at using training mode, the less
likely you are to receive a match request.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 3:06 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Same here. Give me real-time frame data, for example, and l'm a happy man.
But what there is has proved useful in helping me understand how the game
functions.
On 23 Feb 2016 15:04, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Yup, I still haven’t watched xrd’s anime story thing. Haven’t bothered to
play through with anyone other than Ky. I did play through all the previous
sf games with each character though. Something to do when I’m bored.
Anyways, if they were only concentrating on the pure fighting game side,
there are a few things I’d have liked included in the training mode. Also
maybe a versus mode that worked alright too.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 02:50 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re:
The casuals got the short end of the stick for sure. I'm not condoning
Capcom's actions at all, but l paid for a fighting game, which l happen to
play and enjoy, and for that reason alone, it's a worthwhile purchase.
Story mode, survival, a lack of Arcade mode and all of the other trivial
garbage is whatever. KOF2002 UM has less by comparison and l love the game.
GG Xrd has a story mode, Arcade mode and combo challenges, but I spent most
of my time in training mode.
My reason for purchasing SFV was to play it competitively, first and
foremost. I'm just sad that l can't play against the majority of our guys
online due to the server issues :(
On 23 Feb 2016 14:35, "Stephen Scheidel" <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The fact is that eveyone bought an incomplete game.
Capcom is bodying everyone.
On Tuesday, 23 February 2016, richard moorcroft <
greattekkenmaster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And I will body you afterwards after you are done with Lindsey haha
On Feb 23, 2016 12:05 PM, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I body you 5-0 and then I started getting bored and doing random stuff to
make the game interesting.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Stu just admitted now im not good, meaning Im actually like the best and
now you don't wana admit how good I am.
you not ryt man.
Skill recognizes skill
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 23 February 2016 09:30 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: SAFGC - 2016, the fall of the ilitirits
No I'm saying Capcom forgot how to make games.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 11:19 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
so u saying r mika is really good?
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone els
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
