Re: USF4 changes!

  • From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:23:18 +0200

*LOL*
I still have faith in Team ICO though.

On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:21 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> you know wthat gna happen.
>
> they gna make a next gen game that's gna look ass with old gen graphicvs
>
>> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:19:13 +0200
>
>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> You mean rescheduled for the PS4.
>> There fixed :)
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 4:17 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>> > wasn't it scheduled for ps3? I thought it was scrapped
>> >
>> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 16:12:03 +0200
>> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> From: bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> >>
>> >> I want The Last Guardian already!!!
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:31 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> > I get confused with this stuff all the time.
>> >> >
>> >> > I want Darksiders 3
>> >> > :(
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Wynand-Ben <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thats like saying the new Tomb Raider are from the same makers as
>> >> >> Final
>> >> >> Fantasy because they are both from Square Enix.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The developers make the games, not the publishers or whatever one
>> >> >> calls
>> >> >> them
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:56:45 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Namco Bandai?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:52:24 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Its not tho
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 12:43:49 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> what if it was made by the same makers as dark souls?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 14:30:31 +0200
>> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> From: gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Lords of the fallen looks like a wishy washy Souls copy.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have no love for these games that try to ride on other successful
>> >> >> titles
>> >> >> hard work and pioneering.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 27 May 2014 13:50, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Yep. the amount of pressure you can do with all the cancels. very
>> >> >> psychological.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gado and Shen Long is pretty much the same in 3. They might have
>> >> >> toned
>> >> >> down Shen Long's damage and change some of his move list.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3 is pretty much the same as 2. Only difference is combos are a bit
>> >> >> easier
>> >> >> to connect but it's also easier to escape (air recover). only main
>> >> >> difference is that you benefit in going into beast mode more. so you
>> >> >> have to
>> >> >> go into beast mode more often than 2. beast mode changes some move
>> >> >> property
>> >> >> to guard breaker, etc.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If your life is low, beast gauge fills up twice as fast if you stand
>> >> >> still
>> >> >> in 3 apparently. sorta like a rage/ultra system for a comeback.
>> >> >> which
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> nice. i never realize all these technical stuff...only assumed
>> >> >> because
>> >> >> back
>> >> >> then i didn't look it up lolz what i know is just years of practice
>> >> >> and
>> >> >> game
>> >> >> play
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:43 PM, Ryan Williams
>> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I remember reading about Gado and Shen Long being very powerful in
>> >> >> 2.
>> >> >> I'm
>> >> >> completely clueless when it comes to 3 though *lol*
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I like the application of guard cancelling for pressure or during
>> >> >> juggles.
>> >> >> It really opens up the game.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> In BR 2 they say it's Gado and Shen Long due to damage. Gado
>> >> >> apparently
>> >> >> has a CH infinite too lolz but it has to land CH and it's not super
>> >> >> easy to
>> >> >> land either i think. But those 2 are god tier due to damage only, so
>> >> >> if
>> >> >> you
>> >> >> know how to block...it's fine lolz
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BR 3 it's Uranus, she's stupid fast and her juggles is constant. But
>> >> >> her
>> >> >> health bar is the lowest...she dies fast and she also "bounce/float"
>> >> >> higher
>> >> >> than other character...making it easy to combo her too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I didn't know that each character have different health bar like SF.
>> >> >> i
>> >> >> thought it only applied to Stun (having the high health) due to his
>> >> >> slow
>> >> >> speed. Didn't know it applies to all. Gado also have high health.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The more i research, the more bloody roar sounds like SF. they also
>> >> >> have
>> >> >> the guard attack stuff.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Ryan Williams
>> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Who are the god-tier characters? Most of my BR knowledge stems from
>> >> >> just
>> >> >> testing stuff in training mode *lol*
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Damn. Bloody Roar 3 system is deep. The system is pretty
>> >> >> good...don't
>> >> >> know
>> >> >> why they didn't do the same for BR4...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Tier list is pretty good too. Every character is around the same
>> >> >> with
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> exception of 2-3 being god tier...but it still doesn't guarantee
>> >> >> them
>> >> >> wins.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Imma gonna test out the service and adapter first, then I'll be
>> >> >> ordering
>> >> >> that HDMI jobby
>> >> >> When I order that, I'll order yours.
>> >> >> Otherwise we get more duds.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Ryan Williams
>> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Oh and that multi-out to HDMI? I'd like some of that thank you.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Williams
>> >> >> <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> SATA!!!!!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> GIMMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Have you tested it yet? Is it more stable than the IDE adapter?
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> >> >> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sooooooo...
>> >> >> Sap, remember that adapter I sold you?
>> >> >> For R400?
>> >> >> The IDE one...
>> >> >> Yeahhhhh...
>> >> >> I just bought this Sata network adapter for the PS2, and there's
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> PS2
>> >> >> multi-out to HDMI that looks neet too.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Wynand-Ben
>> >> >> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I hope so yea
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:14:58 +0200
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Paas is gonna laugh at us all when KI makes it to PC.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, lindsey kiviets
>> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> tsek,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> KI is the revolution. lords of the fallen looks decent and not
>> >> >> exclusive
>> >> >> to any console so ima get it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I need a 4k monitor to go with my non 4k xbox console.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:44:49 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> LB you counter revolutionary agent!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:13:28 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >> morning peeps,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> lords of the fallen , is that ds3? its the same genre its made by
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> same
>> >> >> company that made ds3. hmm.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I want to xbone man , you guys are just haters. KI is super fun to
>> >> >> watch,
>> >> >> I tried to locate the online matches max had a while back with top
>> >> >> players.
>> >> >> it was ridiculous, j2g.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> with season 2 coming out , tj combo , raptor and cinder are defintly
>> >> >> gna
>> >> >> be in the game.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:37:32 +0200
>> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That's true, although I prefer 2 more for some reason *lol*
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> 3 isn't much different to 2. there's no new system. that's probably
>> >> >> why
>> >> >> i
>> >> >> enjoy it before it went to hell with 4 and it's stupid system.
>> >> >> combos
>> >> >> are a
>> >> >> bit easier in 3 than 2 tho.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM, lindsey kiviets
>> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> http://www.dutycalculator.com/new-import-duty-and-tax-calculation/saved_calculations/view_details/188005117/
>> >> >>
>> >> >> seems fair
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:19:59 +0200
>> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Gamestop is offering Xbox One's for R6080. Good luck getting one for
>> >> >> under that.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:02 PM, lindsey kiviets
>> >> >> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ima get KI,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> with xbone - Kinect being $400 = R5000 here by us , im definetly
>> >> >> getting
>> >> >> it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I want a stick though damn , its gna be expensive.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:59:55 +0000
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The game is free to play, right?
>> >> >> I should probably watch some more vids of the game. I’m thinking
>> >> >> that
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> more you play the game, the more you can see the differences in the
>> >> >> combos.
>> >> >> I haven’t had a good look at the specific differences in the combos
>> >> >> for
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> new KI though.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> The original ones all had such awesome enders – Jago’s wind kick
>> >> >> ender,
>> >> >> Fulgore’s teleport ender, Glacius’ puddleport ender…
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> >> >> On Behalf Of Ryan Williams
>> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:56 PM
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Unfortunately, I will not be one of them.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've tried really, really hard to like KI. I've watched tournament
>> >> >> footage, tried to understand the meta, character options, etc. I can
>> >> >> respect
>> >> >> what the game has to offer in terms of fighting mechanics and the
>> >> >> like,
>> >> >> but
>> >> >> the complete package just doesn't appeal to me at all. The only
>> >> >> character
>> >> >> that even remotely appeals to me is Spinal and that really isn't
>> >> >> saying
>> >> >> much.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Even though the gameplay has definitely evolved since release, and
>> >> >> there
>> >> >> are clear meta strategies being employed during matches, everything
>> >> >> still
>> >> >> looks so... samey... The animations still look jerky instead of
>> >> >> fluid
>> >> >> (I
>> >> >> understand that everyone will have their own opinions on this; this
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> simply my perspective) and the combos don't have much variety (even
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> manuals, which is sad). I'd still play the first one - flawed as it
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> -
>> >> >> over the new one just because of how cool the combos look. There's
>> >> >> just
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> instant appeal and satisfaction when watching/performing combos in
>> >> >> KI1.
>> >> >> In
>> >> >> the new KI, everything just looks really bland and meh. Different
>> >> >> strokes
>> >> >> for different folks, but that's my 2 cents on the game.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
>> >> >> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> BTW, what are the chances that anyone here will get an Xboxone when
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> hits SA officially?
>> >> >> Just wondering if anyone else will play KI…
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> >> >> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
>> >> >> Sent: 26 May 2014 2:38 PM
>> >> >>
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> come play dota2 man.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> you must register your AE on steam anyways.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:26:29 +0200
>> >> >> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>> >> >> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> >> Nah man, was flying solo so I called it quits. Im back to lol again
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> >> >> e-mail
>> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> >> >> communication
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>> >> >> send to
>> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> it. If
>> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> >> >> distribution or
>> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> >> >> prohibited and
>> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>> >> >> subject
>> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >> >> business
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >> >> error-free,
>> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> >> >> destroyed,
>> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>> >> >> ("KPMG
>> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> >> >> services
>> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> >> >> Swiss
>> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> >> >> independent
>> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> >> >> services
>> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> >> >> distinct and
>> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> >> >> obtained
>> >> >> from your KPMG representative.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>> >> >> by
>> >> >> AntiVirus software.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ________________________________
>> >> >> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> >> >> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this
>> >> >> e-mail
>> >> >> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this
>> >> >> communication
>> >> >> in
>> >> >> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error,"
>> >> >> send to
>> >> >> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> it. If
>> >> >> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>> >> >> distribution or
>> >> >> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
>> >> >> prohibited and
>> >> >> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are
>> >> >> subject
>> >> >> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> >> >> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in
>> >> >> this
>> >> >> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>> >> >> business
>> >> >> of
>> >> >> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>> >> >> error-free,
>> >> >> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>> >> >> destroyed,
>> >> >> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative
>> >> >> ("KPMG
>> >> >> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing
>> >> >> services
>> >> >> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a
>> >> >> Swiss
>> >> >> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of
>> >> >> independent
>> >> >> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>> >> >> services
>> >> >> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>> >> >> distinct and
>> >> >> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>> >> >> obtained
>> >> >> from your KPMG representative.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept
>> >> >> by
>> >> >> AntiVirus software.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting
>> >> Game
>> >> Community mailing list.
>> >>
>> >> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>> ========================You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
>> Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
========================================================================You are 
subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.

//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc

Other related posts: