Re: USF4 changes!
- From: Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 13:25:53 +0200
Damn. Bloody Roar 3 system is deep. The system is pretty good...don't know
why they didn't do the same for BR4...
Tier list is pretty good too. Every character is around the same with the
exception of 2-3 being god tier...but it still doesn't guarantee them wins.
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> Imma gonna test out the service and adapter first, then I'll be ordering
> that HDMI jobby
> When I order that, I'll order yours.
> Otherwise we get more duds.
>
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> Oh and that multi-out to HDMI? I'd like some of that thank you.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>
>>> SATA!!!!!!
>>>
>>> GIMMEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!
>>>
>>> Have you tested it yet? Is it more stable than the IDE adapter?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
>>> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sooooooo...
>>>> Sap, remember that adapter I sold you?
>>>> For R400?
>>>> The IDE one...
>>>> Yeahhhhh...
>>>> I just bought this Sata network
>>>> adapter<http://www.dx.com/p/2-5-3-5-sata-hdd-network-adapter-for-ps2-30000-50000-54329#.U4RoVSiPqQh>for
>>>> the PS2, and there's this PS2
>>>> multi-out to
>>>> HDMI<http://www.dx.com/p/ps2-male-to-hdmi-female-converter-adapter-black-150982#.U4RoESiPqQg>that
>>>> looks neet too.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 11:23 AM, Wynand-Ben
>>>> <paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I hope so yea
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 11:14:58 +0200
>>>>>
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> Paas is gonna laugh at us all when KI makes it to PC.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:48 AM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> tsek,
>>>>>
>>>>> KI is the revolution. lords of the fallen looks decent and not
>>>>> exclusive to any console so ima get it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I need a 4k monitor to go with my non 4k xbox console.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> From: paashaasggx@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:44:49 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> LB you counter revolutionary agent!
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> From: lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 07:13:28 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>> morning peeps,
>>>>>
>>>>> lords of the fallen , is that ds3? its the same genre its made by the
>>>>> same company that made ds3. hmm.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want to xbone man , you guys are just haters. KI is super fun to
>>>>> watch, I tried to locate the online matches max had a while back with top
>>>>> players. it was ridiculous, j2g.
>>>>>
>>>>> with season 2 coming out , tj combo , raptor and cinder are defintly
>>>>> gna be in the game.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Tue, 27 May 2014 08:37:32 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> That's true, although I prefer 2 more for some reason *lol*
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> 3 isn't much different to 2. there's no new system. that's probably
>>>>> why i enjoy it before it went to hell with 4 and it's stupid system.
>>>>> combos
>>>>> are a bit easier in 3 than 2 tho.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.dutycalculator.com/new-import-duty-and-tax-calculation/saved_calculations/view_details/188005117/
>>>>>
>>>>> seems fair
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 17:19:59 +0200
>>>>> Subject: Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Gamestop is offering Xbox One's for R6080. Good luck getting one for
>>>>> under that.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:02 PM, lindsey kiviets <
>>>>> lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ima get KI,
>>>>>
>>>>> with xbone - Kinect being $400 = R5000 here by us , im definetly
>>>>> getting it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I want a stick though damn , its gna be expensive.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> From: alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 12:59:55 +0000
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The game is free to play, right?
>>>>> I should probably watch some more vids of the game. I’m thinking that
>>>>> the more you play the game, the more you can see the differences in the
>>>>> combos. I haven’t had a good look at the specific differences in the
>>>>> combos
>>>>> for the new KI though.
>>>>>
>>>>> The original ones all had such awesome enders – Jago’s wind kick
>>>>> ender, Fulgore’s teleport ender, Glacius’ puddleport ender…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 May 2014 2:56 PM
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, I will not be one of them.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've tried really, really hard to like KI. I've watched tournament
>>>>> footage, tried to understand the meta, character options, etc. I can
>>>>> respect what the game has to offer in terms of fighting mechanics and the
>>>>> like, but the complete package just doesn't appeal to me at all. The only
>>>>> character that even remotely appeals to me is Spinal and that really isn't
>>>>> saying much.
>>>>>
>>>>> Even though the gameplay has definitely evolved since release, and
>>>>> there are clear meta strategies being employed during matches, everything
>>>>> still looks so... samey... The animations still look jerky instead of
>>>>> fluid
>>>>> (I understand that everyone will have their own opinions on this; this is
>>>>> simply my perspective) and the combos don't have much variety (even the
>>>>> manuals, which is sad). I'd still play the first one - flawed as it is -
>>>>> over the new one just because of how cool the combos look. There's just
>>>>> this instant appeal and satisfaction when watching/performing combos in
>>>>> KI1. In the new KI, everything just looks really bland and meh. Different
>>>>> strokes for different folks, but that's my 2 cents on the game.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 2:43 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
>>>>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> BTW, what are the chances that anyone here will get an Xboxone when
>>>>> it hits SA officially?
>>>>> Just wondering if anyone else will play KI…
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets
>>>>> *Sent:* 26 May 2014 2:38 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>>
>>>>> come play dota2 man.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> you must register your AE on steam anyways.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:26:29 +0200
>>>>> Subject: RE: USF4 changes!
>>>>> From: euraima@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Nah man, was flying solo so I called it quits. Im back to lol again
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send
>>>>> to
>>>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in
>>>>> this
>>>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>>>
>>>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>>>
>>>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
>>>>> Information
>>>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>>>
>>>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts: