You're the TO. It's your call. On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:40 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > what about xvsf? > > lets play that > > ------------------------------ > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:37:10 +0200 > Subject: Re: KI2 tournament Saturday at JEEVES > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > I would participate if I knew how to play KI2. I only know how to use Jago > in KI1, and even then, I don't know his best combos. > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Wow, I really hate to vote in favour of LB, but I’ll play in a KI2 > tournament. > > > > > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *lindsey kiviets > *Sent:* 21 October 2014 2:18 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* KI2 tournament Saturday at JEEVES > > > > LES go, show of hands who r in? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:16:26 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > You're the TO, so you can decide what you want to run tournaments for. > Doesn't matter which game it is. DongDongNeverDie, SF: The Movie, KI2; it > can be anything. Then you just need to determine how many guys are > interested. If there's sufficient interest, run a tournament for it. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 2:11 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > okay lets play KI2 > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:07:44 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Depends on the level of interest, I suppose. That's usually a good > starting point. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 1:44 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > if I run the tourney will you participate? > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 13:01:02 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > So that's why I'm saying, run tournaments for games that will bring the > hype levels up. I'm giving you the opportunity. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:55 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > I did gauge , last Saturday I gauged the salt levels, it was acidic. > > we need to bring the hype level up and the salty levels down. > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:52:21 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Well, run a tournament for the games then. Bring a PC or laptop, whichever > works. I'll leave mine at home. Then you just need to set up the Challonge > brackets and you're good to go. Don't forget to gauge the level of interest > for the games you want to run the tournaments for. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:47 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > everyone feels the same way > > now you have a choice > > SF the movie the game OR dong dong never DIE > > tsek salie , don't come and quote me, im not a DVD > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:44:30 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > If everyone else feels the same way, I'll stop the tourneys this Saturday. > Seriously. > > > > I don't play DS3. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:38 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > salie plays bb hood like a lame drunk. > > sf memory lane battles are getting old man, its not like ive stopped > playing these games I just don't play it as regular as I used to. > > let me body u in ds3 > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:34:39 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Nope. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:31 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > ft5 tonight > > I win we play ds3 > > u win we play dong dong > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:30:12 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > You can't play Darkstalkers 3. And no. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:28 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > darkstalkers 3 invitional les go!!!!!!!!!!! > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:27:08 +0200 > > > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Yeah, and then I blocked your spam and you were free for the rest of the > matches. If you didn't mash after getting knocked down every single time, > you might have won. Maybe. Actually, no. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > tsek sap, get bopped with my young toguru 100% redizzy combos > > ------------------------------ > > Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:21:10 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > toguru > > > > It's not a major loss. You'll enjoy the hell out of 2. One of the best > RPGs ever made. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I didn’t play Witcher 1 though. Apparently the story is supposed to > continue from some choices in the first one. > Don’t have the time to be playing the old one as well though. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams > *Sent:* 21 October 2014 12:14 PM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* Re: USF4 changes! > > > > Witcher 2 is a good test. That game is one hell of a resource hog. > > > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair < > alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > My new graphics card arrived this morning. Need to plug that puppy in > and see how Witcher 2 runs. Probably better off with something like Shadow > of Mordor where I will be able to see just how sweet the thing is. > > *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > *On Behalf Of *Nicholas Robertson-Muir > *Sent:* 21 October 2014 10:12 AM > *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* RE: USF4 changes! > > Man. That PS2 hackery. > > > Some games look so good in widescreen. > Devil May Cry 1 feels so much less claustrophobic. > We seriously have to do a DefJam FFNY battle at some stage as well. The > game looks good for its years. > > Now I have to remember wtf did I do to get NeoGeo Battle Colisseum to > run? I remember being surprised as hell when Manase told me his "just > worked" > Street Fighter Alpha Anthology, and Darkstalkers collection run on opl > version 5 revision 5. > I gotta try and find that. > > On 21 Oct 2014 07:58, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Morning peeps, > > Blanka is really strong in sf, he should place higher in tournaments > > ------------------------------ > > From: ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx > Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:40:20 +0200 > Subject: Re: USF4 changes! > To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > TJ Combo too stronk > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNFhOwzNzCY > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 11:31 PM, Ashraf Barendse < > ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > dafuq? Nemo saying Ryu is bottom tier. > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Some really awesome matches here. That Ken setup into combo is > ridiculous. > > > > @LB, what time should we start? > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Checkout the CE Blanka vortex @ 13m33s: > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR4jV58lbvo > > Also check out the nice Ken setup into combo he does @ 20m41s. > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:11 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > BTW, CE is still alive and well in Brazil. They had an international > tournament earlier this year: > https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnXZIS9_a8mQJ85rMgEh0Q > > > > > > On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > @Manase: > > This guy has some nice "classic" CE Boxer (ie. the weaker version) > matches on his channel: > https://www.youtube.com/user/sf2ce/search?query=Balrog > > Seems like vs Shotos you have to stand in the range where HP trades with > fireballs. There is also a range where if Boxer blocks a fireball he can > do dash straight and it will punish the next fireball. He also has a > blockstring that leaves him just out for cr.mk range for a whiff-punish. > > (sound is quite loud) > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQZKQsj_9g4 > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > ------------------------------ > > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ > The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally > privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail > by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in > error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to > the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. > If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, > distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, > is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this > e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing > KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information > in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official > business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it. > > KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, > as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, > arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. > > This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG > International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services > to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss > entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent > firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no > services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally > distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information > about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be > obtained from your KPMG representative. > > This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by > AntiVirus software. > > >