[CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Manase Zote <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 16:57:23 +0200
They are definitely prepping for Tekken X Street fighter with Tekken revolution.
Invincible moves+fireball zoning :)
I like it, she is a true troll character and Di's type too. lol
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Di Lhong <numotd@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hadoken from Tekken:
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZ_Gu4iokJE&feature=youtu.be
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Donaldson, Alasdair
> <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hey Lb. You do know that Kahn beat HM Titan a while go, right?
>>
>>
>>
>> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>> On Behalf Of lindsey kiviets
>> Sent: 12 December 2013 10:31 AM
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>
>>
>>
>> I watchd some hakumen footage. He has changed and is harder nw than in
>> cse. Bt due to his OD he is capable of reverse perfect easily, too poonage.
>> Cnt wait to beat khan.
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 08:28:45 +0200
>> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> Dat zoning. Bring on the Hadoukens!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 6:17 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> http://www.eventhubs.com/news/2013/dec/11/eliza-revealed-tekken-revolution-female-vampire-character/
>>
>> i see preparations are in place for tekken x sf
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:43:56 +0200
>> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>>
>> Generally, in SF the block/hit stun is the same no matter which one of the
>> active frames hit. But, after it connects, the rest of the active frames
>> are converted into recovery frames. So a move that hits on the first frame
>> causes the same block/hit stun as if it hit on the last active frame.
>> However, if it hits on the last frame, there are no more active frames to
>> convert into recovery frames, so that gets added to the block/hit advantage.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> They exist in a few moves but only by + or - 1 frame.
>>
>> (certain moves being a frame quicker up close)
>>
>> Not even sure about the new Tekken wrt this.
>>
>>
>>
>> Most of the time if a move is blocked the frames will be the same
>> regardless of range.
>>
>> Meaties exist in the game mostly by just spacing a move to make it hit
>> deep or shallow to have different spacing after block.
>>
>> Pretty sure they have a system in place to keep the frames on block the
>> same regardless.
>>
>>
>>
>> In SF how do they occur ? by overlapping active frames with recovery
>> frames ?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 December 2013 07:58, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I'm curious about how 3D games like Tekken work. Meaties should
>> theoretically exist (eg. when an opponent runs into an active attack), but I
>> suspect that Namco might adjust the frame advantage to compensate.
>> Shouldn't be too hard to test I reckon.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 5:40 PM, Stephen Scheidel <gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> SF is so weird with frames and meaty stuff.
>>
>> That does make it interesting though.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11 December 2013 06:46, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It actually depends on the move. Capcom programmed some moves to have
>> different frame advantage (and even damage eg. Ryu's close st.hp) depending
>> on which frame they hit.
>>
>>
>>
>> But in general to calculate the max frame advantage of a meaty, you take
>> the base frame advantage, add the active frame you're interested in, then
>> subtract 1)
>>
>>
>> So for Boxer's LP dash straight on block (it's actually +5f, not +6f - I
>> was looking at incorrect frame data):
>>
>> 1st active frame = -1f
>>
>> 2nd = 0f
>>
>> 3rd = +1f
>>
>> 4th = +2f
>>
>> 5th = +3f
>>
>> 6th = +4f
>>
>> 7th = +5f
>>
>> I suspect Boxer's overhead may be one of those moves where Capcom decided
>> the frame advantage for active frame individually, because as a late meaty,
>> it should currently give 10 + 21 - 1 = +30f on hit!
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Is there a set amount of frames that are added to a meaty attack? It's not
>> something I've ever researched but I'd be interested to know. I was just
>> curious as you mentioned that the dash straight would be +6 on block as a
>> late meaty.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> PR Rog says Boxer's LP dash straight being -1 on block is too strong. I
>> agree with him. As a late meaty, that would make it +6f on block. If you
>> consider how it's used at the moment (spaced so that it only hits late in
>> the active frames), so characters would be able to do anything but
>> block/focus afterwards. Even their backdashes can get hit because of the
>> low pushback.
>>
>> His LP and MP overhead are now safe on block, but you can only use it for
>> combo afterwards if they hit very meaty.
>>
>> TAP charges faster and is safe even on level 2.
>>
>> EX Smash is also safer. He didn't even need that buff lol.
>>
>> Ultra 1 hits differently and may be changed so that it can be used to
>> chip, but they're still considering changing it.
>>
>> I'm really disappointed they didn't fix his hurt and push boxes. He can
>> easily avoid x-up oki now with delayed wake up so now some characters don't
>> really have pressure options against him. Red Focus doesn't affect him at
>> all (he doesn't have multi-hit attacks that don't break armour). He really
>> doesn't need hitbox anomalies that make it harder to attack him.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:58 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
>> <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> I just "slowly" moved from the last db to uf.
>> An odd half circle.
>> Guile stepped foreward, then Ultra.
>>
>> On 11 Dec 2013 13:15, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> nice nick , what is the notation?
>>
>> also when can we put plan BB into place place? I want to poon lumi and
>> khan at the same time
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:20:43 +0200
>> Subject: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>> From: nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx
>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> So, I managed to get a walk forward ultra with Guile yesterday.
>> ...aaaaand couldn't do it when I tried to record it :(
>>
>> On 11 Dec 2013 11:41, "Sean Carrington" <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> #RESPECT_TO_SMUGDABEST
>>
>>
>>
>> Loser's Final : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKx4aut0ufY
>>
>>
>>
>> Salty Run back : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKx4aut0ufY.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse
>> <ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> It's called Xbox because it's so kak you'll put it back in the box.
>> =========================================================================
>>
>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>
>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If
>> you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or
>> any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and
>> may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject
>> to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client
>> engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this
>> e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official business of
>> the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>
>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
>> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
>> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>
>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services
>> to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
>> separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
>> structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained
>> from your KPMG representative.
>>
>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>> AntiVirus software.
>
>
=========================================================================
You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
//www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
Other related posts:
