The show with the dude that becomes young again?
I liked it. Think that was the show Lance mentioned that he liked as well.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of
Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 09:22 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Hello
Vaguely related, was reading up on some time stuff and came across a link to an
anime called reLife. Anyone seen it?
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On ;
Behalf Of Ilitirit Sama
Sent: 10 May 2018 3:49 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Hello
Brief primer on entanglement:
Particles can be correlated via some property (usually something called
"spin"). If two particles are "normally" correlated, then when you measure the
spin of particle A, then it will be identical to the spin of particle B. If
they are inversely correlated, then once you measure the spin of particle A,
particle B will have the opposite spin. The reason this is significant is
because you can only know the spin of a particle once you measure it. Nothing
really interesting about that. Except that entanglement holds regardless of
the distance between the particles. How does particle B "know" that particle A
was measured? Noone knows yet. This is what Einstein called "spooky action at
a distance".
In the resolution to Stu's question, I proposed a form entanglement that works
across time, not distance. Maybe particles are already entangled across time -
we don't know this for sure yet, but there is some evidence that may be
interpreted in a way that leads to this conclusion. There are experiments
which involve measuring spin of Particle A but not physically looking at it,
then measuring the spin of Particle B after forcing to "spin" in a certain way.
When you look at the spin for Particle A, you'll find that it will always be
correlated to B, even though you measured it first! (I'm taking liberties with
a few technical details, but the gist is the same). How did Particle A "know"
what the spin of Particle B was going to be?
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Ilitirit Sama
<ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Perhaps this could be thought of as some form of cross-temporal entanglement
i.e. No matter or energy is actually transferred; your "configuration" is just
transferred. After all, in the Standard Model, every electron is identical.
And I'm sure the same goes for other fundamental particles (who don't undergo
rapid decay). So it would be the same as making an entangled digital "copy".
Quotes used because it's not a copy (otherwise you would exist in both
timelines simultaneously); your fundamental particle/energy make-up is just
entangled across the temporal boundary with particles in the other timeline.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Okay, something has been bothering me since our discussion on the whole kill
Hitler thing. It’s more on the mechanics of time travel than any of the
philosophical side.
We have two popular theories on time travel. The first is the ‘Back to the
Future’ (BTTF) one where one reality exists. The other is the multiple time
streams dependent upon the choices made. By going back in time, you can create
a new timeline, but the old one will still exist. In that one, you kill Hitler
and a new timeline appears in which Hitler is dead. The old timeline still
exists.
Anyways, my issue is this. In the BTTF one, there is a temporary breach on the
whole conservation of energy thing. If you go back in time, you have introduced
additional energy to that universe at that point. In the long run, it works
out. Even if you die in the past, at the point where you went back in time,
things even out. This is fine if you consider the history of the
universe/timeline as a whole in which conversation takes place.
In the multiple streams side, it is a different matter. Say you go back in time
and shoot Hitler. In that timeline (with Hitler dead), there is additional
energy in that universe – from the chemical reaction of the gun powder, the
thermal energy you are giving off, the mass of the bullet – all of that. This
is energy that you have removed from your original timeline. If time splits at
that point then you have an imbalance between the two timelines in terms of
conservation of energy.
No doubt there are answers to this, but I’m guessing I need more than just 1st
year physics to understand it.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Manase Zote
Sent: 09 May 2018 3:06 PM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Happy birthday Ryan!!!
On Wed, 09 May 2018, 13:24 Ryan Williams,
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Tsek *lol*
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 11:14 lindsey kiviets,
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
HBD sep bletter
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Donaldson, Alasdair
<alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 09 May 2018 06:45 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Hello
Happy birthday. Hope it is all cheerful.
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] On
Behalf Of Ryan Williams
Sent: 09 May 2018 8:24 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Thank you kind sirs :)
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 08:16 euraima tobias,
<euraima@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:euraima@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Happy birfday Sapu!
On Wed, 09 May 2018 at 07:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir
<nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Heppy birthday Sap
On Wed, May 9, 2018, 07:07 Ryan Williams
<ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Thx bro!
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 04:33 Moshe Shevel,
<jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Happy birthday SAP, have an awesome one!
On Mon, 07 May 2018, 11:56 lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
lol donkey from Shrek.
Will probably finish it tonyt. What happened to Preacher? did you watch that
kla? I stopped after a few epis in s2.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 07 May 2018 08:46 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
Finished Happy in one sitting. Went from awesome to
"oh-well-I-started-it-might-as-well-finish-it". Should have just featured him
involved in random acts of senseless violence every episode. Also would have
been 100x better if Donkey from Shrek made an appearance.
I rate it a 6.9/10.
Money Heist is good, not spectacularly so, but good nonetheless. It's
virtually guaranteed Hollywood will try to adapt this for the Western Market.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:40 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
I tried watching heist but I couldn't get over the Spanish talk.
Did you watch Happy?
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 07 May 2018 08:39 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
There are loads of good foreign series/movies. You just haven't been exposed
to them.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:35 AM, lindsey kiviets
<lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
oh no!!!
these foreign guys are making huge strides in filming. I watched an episode of
the rain, and if it weren't for the Russian accents I would've said it was some
kinda big budget American series.
________________________________
From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on behalf
of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>>
Sent: 07 May 2018 08:27 AM
To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Hello
I started watching Money Heist. The mastermind behind the heist uses what
looks like a Hori Fightstick to control the cameras :D
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
________________________________
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged.
It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail by anyone else
is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in error, please
address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to the original
sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it. If you are not the
intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action taken
or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is prohibited and may be unlawful.
Any opinions or advice contained in this e-mail are subject to the terms and
conditions expressed in the governing KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this e-mail and any attachments that do
not relate to the official business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed
by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free, as
information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services to
you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss entity
that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent firms
operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no services to
clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally distinct and
separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information about the
structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be obtained from
your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
