Brief primer on entanglement:
Particles can be correlated via some property (usually something called
"spin"). If two particles are "normally" correlated, then when you measure
the spin of particle A, then it will be identical to the spin of particle B*.
*If they are inversely correlated, then once you measure the spin of
particle A, particle B will have the opposite spin. The reason this is
significant is because you can only know the spin of a particle once you
measure it. Nothing really interesting about that. Except that
entanglement holds *regardless of the distance between the particles.* How
does particle B "know" that particle A was measured? Noone knows yet.
This is what Einstein called "spooky action at a distance".
In the resolution to Stu's question, I proposed a form entanglement that
works across time, not distance. Maybe particles are already entangled
across time - we don't know this for sure yet, but there is some evidence
that may be interpreted in a way that leads to this conclusion. There are
experiments which involve measuring spin of Particle A but not physically
looking at it, then measuring the spin of Particle B after forcing to
"spin" in a certain way. When you look at the spin for Particle A, you'll
find that it will always be correlated to B, *even though you measured it
first!* (I'm taking liberties with a few technical details, but the gist is
the same). How did Particle A "know" what the spin of Particle B was going
to be?
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps this could be thought of as some form of cross-temporal
entanglement i.e. No matter or energy is actually transferred; your
"configuration" is just transferred. After all, in the Standard Model,
every electron is identical. And I'm sure the same goes for other
fundamental particles (who don't undergo rapid decay). So it would be the
same as making an entangled digital "copy". Quotes used because it's not a
copy (otherwise you would exist in both timelines simultaneously); your
fundamental particle/energy make-up is just entangled across the temporal
boundary with particles in the other timeline.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Donaldson, Alasdair <
alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay, something has been bothering me since our discussion on the whole
kill Hitler thing. It’s more on the mechanics of time travel than any of
the philosophical side.
We have two popular theories on time travel. The first is the ‘Back to
the Future’ (BTTF) one where one reality exists. The other is the multiple
time streams dependent upon the choices made. By going back in time, you
can create a new timeline, but the old one will still exist. In that one,
you kill Hitler and a new timeline appears in which Hitler is dead. The old
timeline still exists.
Anyways, my issue is this. In the BTTF one, there is a temporary breach
on the whole conservation of energy thing. If you go back in time, you have
introduced additional energy to that universe at that point. In the long
run, it works out. Even if you die in the past, at the point where you went
back in time, things even out. This is fine if you consider the history of
the universe/timeline as a whole in which conversation takes place.
In the multiple streams side, it is a different matter. Say you go back
in time and shoot Hitler. In that timeline (with Hitler dead), there is
additional energy in that universe – from the chemical reaction of the gun
powder, the thermal energy you are giving off, the mass of the bullet – all
of that. This is energy that you have removed from your original timeline.
If time splits at that point then you have an imbalance between the two
timelines in terms of conservation of energy.
No doubt there are answers to this, but I’m guessing I need more than
just 1st year physics to understand it.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Manase Zote
*Sent:* 09 May 2018 3:06 PM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Happy birthday Ryan!!!
On Wed, 09 May 2018, 13:24 Ryan Williams, <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Tsek *lol*
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 11:14 lindsey kiviets, <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
HBD sep bletter
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Donaldson, Alasdair <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 09 May 2018 06:45 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* RE: Hello
Happy birthday. Hope it is all cheerful.
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
*On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
*Sent:* 09 May 2018 8:24 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Thank you kind sirs :)
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 08:16 euraima tobias, <euraima@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Happy birfday Sapu!
On Wed, 09 May 2018 at 07:50, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Heppy birthday Sap
On Wed, May 9, 2018, 07:07 Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thx bro!
On Wed, 9 May 2018, 04:33 Moshe Shevel, <jaguguarang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Happy birthday SAP, have an awesome one!
On Mon, 07 May 2018, 11:56 lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
lol donkey from Shrek.
Will probably finish it tonyt. What happened to Preacher? did you watch
that kla? I stopped after a few epis in s2.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 07 May 2018 08:46 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
Finished Happy in one sitting. Went from awesome to
"oh-well-I-started-it-might-as-well-finish-it". Should have just
featured him involved in random acts of senseless violence every episode.
Also would have been 100x better if Donkey from Shrek made an appearance.
I rate it a 6.9/10.
Money Heist is good, not spectacularly so, but good nonetheless. It's
virtually guaranteed Hollywood will try to adapt this for the Western
Market.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:40 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I tried watching heist but I couldn't get over the Spanish talk.
Did you watch Happy?
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 07 May 2018 08:39 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
There are loads of good foreign series/movies. You just haven't been
exposed to them.
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 10:35 AM, lindsey kiviets <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
oh no!!!
these foreign guys are making huge strides in filming. I watched an
episode of the rain, and if it weren't for the Russian accents I would've
said it was some kinda big budget American series.
------------------------------
*From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
*Sent:* 07 May 2018 08:27 AM
*To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* Re: Hello
I started watching Money Heist. The mastermind behind the heist uses
what looks like a Hori Fightstick to control the cameras :D
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
------------------------------
The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
obtained from your KPMG representative.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
AntiVirus software.
