Happy New Year guys, all the best for 2015! Stay safe On 31 Dec 2014 11:04 PM, "Manase Zote" <bmlzote@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I hope you got game because I want a ft5 against you at the session... > On 30 Dec 2014 18:29, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> ya i dunno , it smells alot like taken. >> >> i dont like revenge movies. >> >> I watched the croods, good cartoon movie. The voice of the father sounded >> so familiar , turns out it was nicholas cage, lol >> >> I lost at jhb vs cpt 5v5 in bb, i need to hold dat L. cant really talk >> smack now in xrd thread. I just need to silently poon all. >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2014 16:59:39 +0200 >> Subject: Re: CTS community mail >> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> Just finished watching John Wick. The movie is kinda mediocre but the >> action scenes are top notch. >> On 30 Dec 2014 13:39, "Ilitirit Sama" <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Finally made SMB my bitch. They even have this helpful message at the >> end telling you "Congrats! You have finished everying in NSMB!" >> >> On to Bayonetta 2 now. Man, what a game. I can see myself playing this >> for a while. >> >> >> Stupid lol of the day: >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3QcfZhYBzo&feature=youtu.be >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 9:15 PM, Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> *LOL* >> >> That Jean though... >> >> And Professor X looks (and sounds) like Dr. Evil *lol* >> On 29 Dec 2014 21:02, "lindsey kiviets" <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I-iMVsi0IuY >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 15:59:16 +0200 >> Subject: Re: CTS community mail >> From: ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> If you want to get really technical (read: anal) you can say that you'd >> also have to prove that married and unmarried are mutually exclusive >> states. >> >> Consider polygamy: You can be married to 4 women, but then you divorce >> 1. To unmarry someone means to undo a marriage them. So technically in >> this case you are married and unmarried. >> >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 3:30 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> lol, hadn't considered that possibility :P >> >> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:10 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Correct, except if you use Constructive Logic. In that case you would be >> required to prove that Alice, Bob and Charlie are indeed a married or >> unmarried person, and you would not be able to use the Law of the Excluded >> Middle or Double Negation. >> >> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intuitionistic_logic >> >> Why is this important? Because Alice, Bob and Charlie may in fact be the >> name of animals (not people), which would either mean the answer is False >> or undecidable. >> >> But we are reasonable folk after all, so we can appeal to Occam's Razor >> to handle that. >> >> >> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:25 PM, sameegh jardine <sameegh@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> Yes, because irrespective of Alice's status the question being asked will >> be held true for either the first or second statement. >> >> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> By the way, here's a riddle: >> >> Bob is looking at Alice. Alice is looking at Charlie. Bob is married. >> Charlie is not. >> >> Is a married person looking at an unmarried person? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>