Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Ryan Williams <ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:21:06 +0200
[image: Inline image 1]
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Rasputin revival.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <
> nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Not yet, give me time.
>> On 14 Jan 2014 14:02, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <
>> alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> From the name I assumed it would be nsfw.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:
>>> cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Ryan Williams
>>> *Sent:* 14 January 2014 2:02 PM
>>> *To:* cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> *Subject:* Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *lol* The Nic!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Very entertaining :P
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:42 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> http://youtu.be/ZqFl_e1WOGA
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Stephen Scheidel <
>>> gieroadsteve@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> They could have saved themselves the embarrassment and just done this
>>> from the beginning.
>>>
>>> have they fixed the issue with the civilians losing the plot?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 14/01/2014, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> > I was playing till nearly 11pm. You could have just sent me a message
>>> via
>>> > Steam Chat.
>>> >
>>> > Noone saw this coming...
>>> >
>>> > http://www.simcity.com/en_US/blog/article/simcity-offline-is-coming
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 7:46 AM, lindsey kiviets
>>> > <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Gb you missing out man. KOF matches are intensifying online.
>>> >>
>>> >> scumbag ilitrit says we must play on dolphin, doesn't show up to get
>>> >> beat.
>>> >>
>>>
>>> >> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> >> Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 22:42:54 +0200
>>> >>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>>> >> From: sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx
>>> >> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Oh yes. Wow, sorry.
>>> >>
>>> >> Yeah, I saw that on TFG.
>>> >>
>>> >> We all know that this is going to suck though. Even if it is directed
>>> by
>>> >> the Ong Bak guy, it would probably just be a "wow cool fight scene"
>>> >> movie
>>> >> that with Tekken- characters that don't follow the proper story... at
>>> >> all.
>>> >>
>>> >> If the other Tekken movie was called BloodSport 2099 or something, I
>>> >> probably wouldn't hate it as much.
>>> >>
>>> >> Even the CGI Tekken movie was absurd. I don't get it.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:36 PM, Ilitirit Sama
>>> >> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> He's referring to her seismo.
>>> >>
>>> >> New Tekken movie by Ong Bak director.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2014-01-13-theres-a-new-tekken-movie
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 9:38 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> She has a command throw?
>>> >>
>>> >> Not that I need a command throw to turn her into a grappler ;-p
>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 19:39, "Nicholas Robertson-Muir" <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Imagine you're playing as Shen when picking C.Viper... only with
>>> >> more...Benimaru...and K'... and Daimon.
>>> >> On 13 Jan 2014 18:15, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> That is what you told me since you met me. Play Sakura, Cammy or
>>> Viper.
>>> >>
>>> >> Ugh, those feints look like a bother to do but hey, I'll give her a
>>> >> proper
>>> >> bash. Should be fun.
>>> >>
>>> >> First ten second of the video looks like fun.
>>> >>
>>> >> Was watching this guy Zeny53's Elf... LOL. The guy is the best.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Ilitirit Sama <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> @GB:
>>> >>
>>> >> I really think you would enjoy C.Viper in SSFIV. She's really cheap
>>> and
>>> >> her pressure game is kinda like what a KOF character would do.
>>> >>
>>> >> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXFonlAPlWw
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>> =========================================================================
>>>
>>> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>>>
>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
>>> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
>>> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
>>> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
>>> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
>>> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
>>> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
>>> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
>>> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
>>> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
>>> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
>>> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>>>
>>> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or
>>> error-free, as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost,
>>> destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>>>
>>> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
>>> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
>>> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
>>> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
>>> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
>>> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
>>> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such. Information
>>> about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member firm can be
>>> obtained from your KPMG representative.
>>>
>>> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
>>> AntiVirus software.
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
