RE: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
- From: Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 11:30:59 +0200
Hi my name is Nick, my ggpo handel was Ennohex.
I got bored with beating people with random things and moved on to KOF 13.
I thought I was awesome at fighting games until Lumi (aka Sameegh) beat me
so badly in Tekken that I thought the battle would take longer if I just
put the controller down.
It did.
I play all the crap games so that other people don't have to.
That's enough about me, I got to get back to working on my Ken's Rage
combos.
On 5 Feb 2014 11:20, "Donaldson, Alasdair" <alasdair.donaldson@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Hello there!
> My name is Stu. I have played many Tekken games against various people in
> South Africa. Some games were hard, but in the end we all became friends
> and that what matters.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:cpt-fgc-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Jack Steel
> Sent: 05 February 2014 11:09 AM
> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
>
> My ggpo user is goku1up- and finalfighter i smashed many ggpo kof 2002
> players avk team sa and other locals they tried all cheats 2 no profit i
> hope to get smashed in kof13 and other platforms.smash or b
> smashed"d.^_^;)
>
> On 2/3/14, Nicholas Robertson-Muir <nicmuir@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > I wonder if they would have done the same if it was me?
> >
> > Or would they be all like... call the hospital, this man is about to
> > have a heart-attack.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Sean Carrington
> > <theseancarrington@xxxxxxxxx
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> I think I'm troubled.
> >>
> >> I might have cursed one too many times at the GM of Telkom Claremont.
> >> I was escorted out of the mall by security... *facepalm*.
> >> On 03 Feb 2014 4:02 PM, "G B" <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> "subjective prices" - I mean that they are priced subjectively...
> >>> See DeBont and Thaler (1985)'s classic overreaction hypothesis, or
> >>> google anything on herding, as a basic yet 'oh so' applicable example.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 3:52 PM, G B <sigma.g19@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Never heard of Peter Stone. Can you send me the title of the
> >>>> article or the pdf? I'd love to read it.
> >>>>
> >>>> The reason why its frequently mentioned/used within the Hedge Fund
> >>>> industry is due to how rapidly HFs change, as can be seen in the
> >>>> quant meltdown of 2007 (In three days, you could've made R1 turn
> >>>> into R500, if you were at the right place at the right time).
> >>>> Testing for adaption here is extremely interesting, and saves you
> >>>> years of work. HFs is also the canary in the coal mine in world of
> >>>> finance.
> >>>>
> >>>> You are spot on with the over-fitting issue. :-) I corrected this
> >>>> when I implemented mine. When using fundamental analysis, they'd
> >>>> implement like,
> >>>> 15 different fundamental metrics, of which maybe 4 or 5 have any
> >>>> statical significance. In fact, certain researchers went to the
> >>>> extent of running a GA to select the variables for "best-fit"
> >>>> first... which is akin to data-mining in the sense that they are
> >>>> finding the best variables that fit with the given data BEFORE
> >>>> running the algorithm.
> >>>>
> >>>> And yes, the evolutionary algorithm is trained using a data-base
> >>>> first, before it goes live. Typically, the GA selects the variables
> >>>> and the ANN is what does all the decision making. Having the
> >>>> computer decide what it should do for both is unwise, or at least,
> >>>> I think so.
> >>>>
> >>>> Like I said, you put garbage in, you going to get garbage out, that
> >>>> is how it works with these black box machines, so yeah, people have
> >>>> used GA's before, but like we both mentioned, how you program it
> >>>> and I would is totally different, which means it would learn
> >>>> differently, just as we do.
> >>>>
> >>>> You also mentioned "Buy-Low/Sell-High" when there are economic
> >>>> shocks, which is a great strategy, sure, but stock prices will
> >>>> adjust accordingly anyway, so while they may be cheaper than usual,
> >>>> they won't necessarily be mispriced, which is what I'm interested
> >>>> in. I can't always wait for some kind of external economic movement
> >>>> to make money.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you've said, I don't want to match the market at all, else I'd
> >>>> go passive. Stocks are priced at the value that the market values
> >>>> it at and those are often subjective prices, more often than not.If
> >>>> I had a basic program to initiate buy/sell commands based on
> >>>> whether a stock falls below/above a certain price and expect it to
> >>>> earn money, I'd be a billionaire by now.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Ilitirit Sama
> >>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> @GB
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I did some reading up on using GA against the stock market. It
> >>>>> seems some Hedge Funds use them already, but most of these funds
> >>>>> are already defunct (probably not because of the use of GAs
> >>>>> though). Was that paper you mentioned by Peter Stone? It answers
> >>>>> a lot of the questions I had.
> >>>>> It
> >>>>> seems the evolution of the ANN happens way before the data is run
> >>>>> on live data. Stock Market GAs also tend to suffer from
> >>>>> "over-fitting", which is something I also mentioned. They try to
> >>>>> adjust to past performance in order to generate an expected
> >>>>> result. However, most GAs don't take into account random
> >>>>> fluctuations in the result, so they fail miserably when they try
> >>>>> to derive patterns from the data. The best they can do is to try
> >>>>> to match the curve, which of course is very bad.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Ilitirit Sama
> >>>>> <ilitirit@xxxxxxxxx>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> He needs to confirm the subscription. The link should be at the
> >>>>>> bottom of any of the admins' messages. Give me his email address.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 2:03 PM, lindsey kiviets
> >>>>>> <lindseyak@xxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>> > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> lol,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> @ilitrit , gimme th fgc link again please.i added Hilton myself
> >>>>>>> , and it seems he is not added to the mails.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>>> Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 13:59:14 +0200
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [CPT-FGC] Re: Hi
> >>>>>>> From: ryan820509@xxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>> To: cpt-fgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> *lol* Guys will just have to put their cellphones where I can
> >>>>>>> see em, or else :P Scumbaggery at it's finest :P
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm busy editing the vids. Will start uploading soon :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Ashraf Barendse <
> >>>>>>> ashraf.barendse@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> The first rule of Random FG club is...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Gohan is a charge character. I know this because LB knows this.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ================================================================
> >>>>>>> ========= You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game
> >>>>>>> Community mailing list.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
> =========================================================================
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
> **********************************************************************
> The information in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally
> privileged. It is intended solely for the addressee. Access to this e-mail
> by anyone else is unauthorized. If you have received this communication in
> error, please address with the subject heading "Received in error," send to
> the original sender, then delete the e-mail and destroy any copies of it.
> If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying,
> distribution or any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it,
> is prohibited and may be unlawful. Any opinions or advice contained in this
> e-mail are subject to the terms and conditions expressed in the governing
> KPMG client engagement letter. Opinions, conclusions and other information
> in this e-mail and any attachments that do not relate to the official
> business of the firm are neither given nor endorsed by it.
>
> KPMG cannot guarantee that e-mail communications are secure or error-free,
> as information could be intercepted, corrupted, amended, lost, destroyed,
> arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses.
>
> This email is being sent out by KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG
> International") on behalf of the local KPMG member firm providing services
> to you. KPMG International Cooperative ("KPMG International") is a Swiss
> entity that serves as a coordinating entity for a network of independent
> firms operating under the KPMG name. KPMG International provides no
> services to clients. Each member firm of KPMG International is a legally
> distinct and separate entity and each describes itself as such.
> Information about the structure and jurisdiction of your local KPMG member
> firm can be obtained from your KPMG representative.
>
> This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept by
> AntiVirus software.
> You are subscribed to the Cape Town Fighting Game Community mailing list.
>
> //www.freelists.org/list/cpt-fgc
>
Other related posts:
