Re: [cpsig] Re: CPR 5900 Selkirk's west of Taft, BC.

  • From: "K V Railway" <kvrailway@xxxxxxx>
  • To: <cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 13:43:04 -0800

Derek, I guess the answer to your question is like so many other questions - it's subjective. However, from what I've witnessed over the years, some of the answers are:

1. there is a dispute over ownership of the photos - copyrights or family quarrels.
2. there is a question about the content of the image - somebody doing something they shouldn't - embarrassing or illegal.
3. there is a question as to how the possessor obtained the photo in the first place - i.e. something lifted from company files without due authorization.
4. there are collectors who like art collectors and every other kind of collector, revel in having a unique something that nobody else has.

I'm sure there are many other reasons too.

Joe Smuin

-----Original Message----- From: Derek Boles
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 7:23 AM
To: cpsig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [cpsig] Re: CPR 5900 Selkirk's west of Taft, BC.


1b. Re: [casing] Re: CPR 5900 Selkirk's west of Taft, BC.
   Posted by: "K V Railway" kvrailway@xxxxxxx kvrailway
   Date: Sun Nov 14, 2010 11:07 am ((PST))

Old-timers are sometimes quite aware of the historical value of their
material.  They have their good reasons for not sharing this material,
frustrating as that may be to the modelling and rail-fan community.

And what, pray tell, would those good reasons be? I've encountered a number of rail photographers or copyright owners of rail photographs who think that they're sitting on top of some gold mine. Maybe they read the news stories of some of these Ansel Adams or Winston Link photographs that are fetching a fortune these days. Or they hear of some idiot on eBay with more money than brains who pays $700 for a slide.

The vast majority of rail photographs are only of interest to railfans and historians and I think these old-timers are dreaming if they think that some billionaire collector is going to come along and make them rich. They've got a better chance of that by buying lottery tickets.

Obviously these photographs are of interest to rail authors who can then share them with the rest of the world in a publication. I haven't heard of any millionaire rail authors since Lucius Beebe died half a century ago. Most rail authors I know end up spending their own money to get their stuff in print when you take into consideration the cost of acquiring decent prints from public archives.

Derek Boles




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links





Other related posts: