Charlie, we always have the non-core team neutral sign the PA and come to the
full team meeting at which they share their findings/opinions, but, that said,
each case is unique. Might depend on your team dynamic.
p.s. This is a great way to spread the word (about how CP works) into the legal
community, among non-family lawyers. If he ends up being interested, you can
refer him to Global Collaborative Law Council for civil collaborative
practitioners.
Joryn
Changing the Way the World Gets Divorced!™
How? Check it out at https://JorynJenkins.com
[signature_1778903593]
From: <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "Charles Spiegel
charlesspiegellaw@xxxxxxxxx [CollabLaw]" <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: "CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Friday, October 18, 2019 at 7:51 AM
To: "CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [CollabLaw] Opinions solicited
I have a CP case which I'd love some input on. Thanks in advance. These
conversations are so helpful!
Happens to be a single coach, financial neutral and lawyer for each spouse.
Largest asset is valuable corporate stock. Team needs corporate law advice on
various methods of dividing the rights in the shares. So clients will hire a
Corp lawyer as a neutral.
Some of you may have experiences with such additional neutral experts of
various types...
Two questions.
1. How should we consider if full team should be at meetings where Corp lawyer
presents their findings? Seems to me/us? yes. Clients tho wealthy, are
wanting to control costs......
2. How should we decide if Corp atty must sign on to our CP Agt? Assuming they
are willing to include disqualification language in their representation agt.
Particularly if you've had experience with such limited scope neutrals, would
love to hear how you may have thought about these issues!
Thanks again.
Charlie Spiegel, Esq.
charlesspiegellaw..com<http://charlesspiegellaw.com>
Attachment:
binBGtv6XhJ7a.bin
Description: image001.png
