Amen!!
Kevin R. Scudder
The Law Offices of Kevin R. Scudder
Salal Credit Union Headquarters
9706 4th Avenue N.E., Suite 320
Seattle, WA 98115-2157
Phone: (206) 524-7828
Facsimile: (206) 524-1302
Please review my video at: http://www.ballardcollaborativelaw.com/videos/
Visit my Website at http://www.ballardcollaborativelaw.com/
Visit my Website at http://www.scudderlaw.net/
A Member of Cypress Collaborative Solutions:
http://cypresscollaborative.com/index
This transmission contains confidential information which is legally
privileged. It is sent under authority of the Uniform Electronic Transactions
Act, 12A O.S. 15‑101 et seq. and any relevant United States, State or
International laws or treaties. The information is intended only for the use of
the individual or entity stated on this form. No confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you are not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution,
or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is
strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, please immediately
delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it
and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient.
From: CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 7:56 AM
To: 'CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx' <CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [CollabLaw] Ideas for Advanced Symposium Training in NM
Well said Gary. I am really trying to truly give up litigation and just
represent client’s in Collaborative Law cases. Most reasonable attorneys can
represent their clients in little “c” cases as long as the other attorney is
reasonable. The true peacemaker is willing to stand up and say Collaborative
is spelled with a “C”. It is rough going here in Indiana, but there are a few
practitioners who are truly marching to “C’s” drums. I truly appreciate the
guidance we are getting from the Collaborative community.
Tamie Jo Morog<http://www.kirtleytaylorlaw.com/contact/tamie-jo-morog>
Harrison & Moberly
Collaborative Law Attorney
Registered Civil Law Mediator
Registered Family Law Mediator
114a<x-apple-data-detectors://2/0> South Meridian Street
Lebanon, Indiana 46052-2522<x-apple-data-detectors://2/0>
Office: 317-639-4511<tel:(765)%20483-8549>
tmorog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tmorog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www.harrisonmoberly.com<http://www.harrisonmoberly.com/>
Confidentiality Notice: This message and any attachments contain information
from the law firm Harrion & Moberly, LLP that may be confidential, privileged,
attorney work-product or exempt from disclosure. If you are not the intended
recipient, the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is
prohibited. If you receive this email in error or are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender by return email or by telephone and
promptly delete this email and any attachments from your computer. Receipt by
any unintended recipient is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work-product
or other privilege.
From: CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2019 9:47 AM
To: CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Lorrie Kehl-Paul
Subject: Re: [CollabLaw] Ideas for Advanced Symposium Training in NM
I have enjoyed reading the replies on the issue of little "c".
It does happen that we are enticed to act beyond the norm, to believe that
facts of the case require us to act beyond otherwise good judgement. I am
routinely requested to provide service in a manner that could undermine the
integriy of the work.
These requests are almost always fear based with the fear being that the
prescribed way of doing things somehow don't apply in this situation. That
something terrible will occur without our acquiescence.
These requests also play on our ego, that we are the one who must save the day,
lest some terrible fate befall the client.
Fear and ego.
We must be clear in our conviction and when faltering, seek support and
consultation.
We must strive to manage our ego, our own narcissism that we are somehow the
only one available to keep things well.
When we let go of fear and hold our ego in check, the allure of little "c"
subsides.
Clients may go. We may not be there as they would wish us to be.
However, should things not transpire as they would have wished. We remain
available for their possible return.
If that should transpire their faith in us is heightened. Why? Because we
maintained our integrity and that creates trust. That serves the process, our
client and ourselves.
Gary Direnfeld, MSW, RSW
www.yoursocialworker.com
www.garydirenfeld.com
.
-------- Original message --------
From: "Robert Merlin rmerlin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [CollabLaw]"
<CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2019-03-28 8:19 p.m. (GMT-05:00)
To: CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Lorrie Kehl-Paul <lorrie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [CollabLaw] Ideas for Advanced Symposium Training in NM
Absent the signed contract and disqualification provision, call it what you
will, but it is NOT the Collaborative Process. Professionals are free to
practice as they want, but they should not claim to use the Collaborative
Process unless they are following the rules. When Stu Webb created this
concept, he intended the attorney disqualification to be THE distinguishing
characteristic. There is a reason why the Uniform Laws Commission made the
signed Participation Agreement and attorney disqualification requirements of
the Collaborative Process. 18 jurisdictions now have the UCLA. Feel free to
contact me if you want help adopting it in New Mexico.
Bob Merlin
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 28, 2019, at 6:31 PM, Bobbie Batley
bbatley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:bbatley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [CollabLaw]
<CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:CollabLaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi all –
The NM Collaborative Practice Group is planning a fall 2019 Symposium. Our
community has been struggling with something that keeps bubbling up. Over the
last 5 years give or take, there has been a development of practitioners in our
community that do not feel the need for signing a Collaborative Agreement with
a disqualification requirement. Please don’t shoot the messenger – I am “old
school”. The folks doing this are calling it “little C” and have only recently
begun to see issues with this. We are looking for insight from other
communities that may have struggled with this AND we are looking for some
speakers on this topic.
Any help from this group would be sooo appreciated!
Very truly,
Bobbie Batley
<image001.png>
T 505.246.0500 | F 505.246.9953
316 Osuna Rd NE, Suite 301
Albuquerque, NM 87107
www.lgtfamilylaw.com<http://www.lgtfamilylaw.com/>
<image002.png> <image003.png> <image004.png>
<image006.jpg>
Attachment:
bin2JnzdeDAht.bin
Description: image001.jpg
Attachment:
binTMFQuN779n.bin
Description: image002.jpg
Attachment:
binNNowI6Zuzf.bin
Description: image003.jpg
