I concur with accepting the general concept represented in the drawing presented at the last meeting of the steering group. Bob Younger On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Kathy <kathykassel@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I vote we accept the general concept drawing as our guide For building the > monument > > Sent from my iPad > > On Oct 2, 2013, at 7:55 PM, "Bob Robeson" <bobroby@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > I vote we accept the drawing handed out at our last meeting Oct 25th.**** > > Bob R.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* cedarfirememorialsteeringgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ > mailto:cedarfirememorialsteeringgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<cedarfirememorialsteeringgroup-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>] > *On Behalf Of *Ingrid Coffin > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 02, 2013 7:53 PM > *To:* cedarfirememorialsteeringgroup@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [cedarfirememorialsteeringgroup] Cedar Fire Monument: This is > a GET YOUR ATTENTION email**** > > ** ** > > Our committee needs to make a decision on the Hubbell drawings that we > handed out at our last meeting. I need that tomorrow if possible, no later > than Friday. This is because both James and I are leaving town on the 13thand > not returning until Oct 24. James needs to create the rendering and we > need to pick it up, if we intend to implement his design and show it as our > intention at the Oct 26th event.**** > > ** ** > > I know we haven’t done the ‘details’ of the construction of James’ design, > but at least the concept has to be what we intend to implement. Otherwise, > it should not be presented to the public. What he would paint (a watercolor > rendering) is the bottom scene on the drawings that you have. Not the > aerial, architectural design at the top.**** > > ** ** > > Please give me your decision. Thanks.**** > > Ingrid**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > *"Following your dream may be hard, but ignoring your dream is > disastrous."***** > > **** > > To subscribe to Ingrid's free weekly Meta-Thoughts® visit > www.Meta-Thoughts.com <http://www.meta-thoughts.com/>**** > > ** ** > >