[bvipilots] Re: Microsoft Flight simulator fx versus Prepar3D
- From: Robert Cezar <robert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: bvipilots@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:40:59 -0700
Hi Adam,
Basically, there's only one significant difference between FSX and P3D; P3D
uses multi-threading to significantly improve scenery rendering. As far as
the rest is concerned, I think FSX is the better environment, For example,
there's no real-weather service provided with P3D... you need to buy a
third-party add on.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Robert
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Adam <brailledog@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello List, ****
>
> ** **
>
> I am looking at getting back to actively flying again! However, it looks
> like there has been some additions and developments since the last time I
> have been doing this! What I am wanting to know is FX simulator still the
> preferred program as far as compatiblility goes? I see that they have
> released a second service pack, if so I will stick with this; or the other
> program that looks like is supported is Prepar3D! How well does this work
> what are your thoughts about the differences to best maximize the iyp
> program? ****
>
> Thanks a lot for any suggestions or help!****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
--
AOPA Member No: 06936977
Other related posts:
