[bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- From: Sandy Licht <slicht@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:00:31 -0600
I determine what I want my file name to be before I start. I agree,
though. There should probably be another way to create file names within
Bookport Transfer.
At 01:44 PM 1/10/2006, you wrote:
I was helping a new user with the Bookport and came to see how
non-standard (at least to me) the "send filename as title" option is. I
personally would like to see this gone, unless there are users who really
like to see the first line of the file as the bookport file name in which
case it should be left; I would be surprised.
At least however, it should be checked by default for the new user;
unchecked by default makes it operate differently from any Windows-related
file transfer utility.
Just my opinion I realize, but I think it unwise to force new users to
tweak the first line of every file they want to send to the bp just to get
the right filename on the unit. Please check this by default.
Don
Sandy Licht
Phone: 409-898-8218
Jeremiah 29:11 - 14A
11For I know the plans I have for you," says the LORD. "They
are plans for good and not for disaster, to give you a future and a hope.
12In those days when you pray, I will listen. 13If you look for me in earnest,
you will find me when you seek me. 14I will be found by you," says the
LORD...
Other related posts:
- » [bookport] very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited
- » [bookport] Re: very non-standard, an old issue revisited