Ok then, how about a watch battery, they're thinner, or a hearing aid
battery, they're also not too thick. Any type that could be used, if the
rechargeable dies.
I hate the fact I'll be losing my portability, and will be tied to
electric
power.
At least develop a recharger that could be used to charge a second
battery,
while the first battery is being used.
Pamela
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pamela Rader
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:26 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: new book port Voices
It's too thin to hold that type of battery.
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of William & Pamela
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2010 9:09 AM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: new book port Voices
You know, in many of the digital cameras now days you can use either
rechargeable batteries, or regular double A batteries. That way, if your
rechargeables die at a crucial moment you can always whip out the double
A(s) and keep on clicking away at those pictures.
I wonder why something similar can't also be done for the Bookport Plus?
Pamela
-----Original Message-----
From: bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bookport-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ann Byrne
Sent: Tuesday, February 09, 2010 2:17 PM
To: bookport@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [bookport] Re: new book port Voices
I too am disappointed with Sam and Tom. Adding to that the
rechargeable instead of replaceable battery removes two of the
reasons Book Port has continued to be my preference for reading text
and listening to MP3 files.
